by zellyn on 6/24/24, 2:23 PM
If you're interested in Gren, you might also like Roc — roc-lang.org. It's a definite descendent of Elm too, although not a fork: the compiler is written in Rust, the platforms (a fascinating and powerful concept) in Rust and Zig.
by fermigier on 6/24/24, 10:26 AM
by cies on 6/24/24, 9:51 AM
by fire_lake on 6/24/24, 10:01 PM
How does Green plan to distinguish itself from OCaml given that you can transpile OCaml to JS and run it in Node today?
(I’m a big fan of MLs so this is a genuine question!)
by anonzzzies on 6/24/24, 9:49 AM
I like the explanation why it is simple. In reality people won't like this because they like something like '+' to mean more things. Look at how rapidly people get 'upset' with OCaml because '+' and '+.' etc. Seems Gren does not go that far, but does not allow + for strings or any conversion (although + is for floats?).
by Karupan on 6/25/24, 10:13 AM
I’ve asked this somewhere before, but didn’t get an answer. Are there plans for Gren to:
1. Improve FFI (aka Elm Kernel for everyone)
2. Support Self hosted packages
3. Implement LSP for better IDE integration?
Im cautiously optimistic about Gren, and hopefully some of these concerns can be addressed.
by SillyUsername on 6/24/24, 9:12 AM
This looks like a fun language to learn if you have the time, I prefer the syntax Vs Go.
I have a concern that as with most new new languages adoption and commercial support affects the uptake, a chicken and egg scenario.
Early days at 0.4 but what are the future plans?
by iamdamian on 6/24/24, 5:03 PM
Any plans for typeclasses?