by elektor on 6/21/24, 6:48 PM with 94 comments
by whimsicalism on 6/21/24, 7:19 PM
The US should probably negotiate 'most favored nation' status so they get the lowest price offered among the OECD (maybe adjusted by national income per capita) such that there is less global free ridership - but even that probably won't do that much to shift the cost burden.
We should also invest in lowering the costs of drug design & trialing so we can lower the risk premium and startup cost.
by FredPret on 6/21/24, 7:18 PM
Nathan Rothschild, richest man in the world, died from an ailment that could be cured basically for free today using penicillin. But when penicillin came out, it was an expensive and "whizzy" new drug.
by elektor on 6/21/24, 6:48 PM
by darth_avocado on 6/21/24, 7:21 PM
by HybridCurve on 6/21/24, 7:34 PM
by aantix on 6/21/24, 7:18 PM
Is the limitation really the payment model?
They're having trouble keeping up with demand, even at the current high prices.
It appears that the innovation has to occur at scaling the manufacturing.
by boringg on 6/21/24, 7:15 PM
by ianferrel on 6/21/24, 7:19 PM
Traditionally, avant garde tech is very expensive and available in limited quantities, then prices come down and things become more broadly affordable.
Every drug was a whizzy new drug at some point. Most of them are now common and affordable. The people who the drug will help cheaply in 20 years will benefit greatly.
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on 6/22/24, 7:41 AM
https://beta.economist.com/by-invitation/2024/06/14/what-goo...
by hackeraccount on 6/22/24, 11:38 AM
by peter-m80 on 6/24/24, 8:26 AM
by cyanydeez on 6/21/24, 10:17 PM
by JohnMakin on 6/21/24, 7:21 PM