by iamphilrae on 6/21/24, 9:45 AM with 70 comments
by whicks on 6/21/24, 12:41 PM
As a backpacker and avid hiker, no thank you. I go outside to intentionally avoid screens and the internet/connected world. Fortunately I can just not buy this and it won’t have an impact on my life.
Another interesting thing I’m curious about is if this would provide any benefits to SAR crews over traditional sat phones. I could potentially see some benefits there, maybe, but I guess time will tell.
by devit on 6/21/24, 12:17 PM
- FlexSolar 40W panel: 1.35kg
- Nitecore NB20000 ~75Wh battery: 300g
- Starlink Mini: 1.1kg
- Smartphone: 250g
For 3kg you have something that should give 2-3 hours of Internet usage on an average EU/USA good weather day (assuming 20% solar panel for 10 hours = 80Wh/day, 25-35W power usage of Starlink Mini + smartphone).
For each extra 1.65kg you get an additional 2-3 hours, resulting in 7.95kg for 8-12 hours, 11.25kg for 12-16 hours.
Not bad, but not good either.
by tosh on 6/21/24, 10:32 AM
(right now you only get a Starlink Mini if you are an early Starlink customer and it requires an existing residential subscription)
by lxgr on 6/21/24, 1:15 PM
I wonder how much more bandwidth this uses compared to their stationary terminals. There's almost certainly a power/size vs. data rate trade-off here, which can explain why they don't offer it standalone in the US yet (the reasoning probably being that people will use their more efficient larger antenna at home most of the time), but do have standalone plans in areas where they probably have less users overall.
by JumpCrisscross on 6/21/24, 10:13 AM
by alexpc201 on 6/21/24, 12:11 PM
by bookofjoe on 6/21/24, 9:12 PM
by wslh on 6/21/24, 10:50 AM
by cjk2 on 6/21/24, 11:33 AM
Literally we all use eSIMs and just have downtime occasionally, which is partially the point of it.