by lando2319 on 6/19/24, 3:11 PM with 33 comments
by happytoexplain on 6/19/24, 4:05 PM
I think this goes beyond sensationalism and into lying. It sounds like this will have no long-term effect, much less one that would count as "damage", but who knows. Regardless, obviously the word "damaged" is very inappropriate at this time.
Edit: In case it's not obvious, none of this is a commentary on the protest itself.
by maronato on 6/19/24, 4:07 PM
They took advantage of an upcoming event to raise awareness in a way that is ultimately harmless. Had they not done this I wouldn’t know about the labor party’s lackluster climate plans.
Mission accomplished.
by jgrahamc on 6/19/24, 3:18 PM
EDIT: HN guidelines are to use the original title. It is: "Climate protesters arrested after painting Stonehenge monument orange". It does not claim damage was done and the article is vague on damage and so I think the HN headline is unjustified.
by nashashmi on 6/19/24, 3:49 PM
Paint will come off in a couple of days. Some bits will remain as their mark on its history.
by LordDragonfang on 6/19/24, 3:49 PM
Sensationalist title. It also doesn't match the current title of the actual article:
> Climate protesters arrested after painting Stonehenge monument orange
by 0xbadc0de5 on 6/19/24, 5:26 PM