by madspindel on 6/11/24, 8:39 AM with 12 comments
by happymellon on 6/11/24, 10:23 AM
It's also not a product designed with my requirements either as I feel they take the piss with their "stable" ideology especially when a project doesn't follow the versioning scheme that Debian wants it to. But it doesn't make it wrong, it's just unsuitable for what you want.
Use Suse or Fedora if you want a simple yet up to date Linux. The rest of us who just want an up to date working system already did.
by anthk on 6/11/24, 9:02 AM
> It should be up to the user to decide if to pin a program to an older version, not the Debian maintainers
IRL, stability matters. And no one wants to break things over a stable version.
Maybe for browsers it's OK, as you have a parallel ESR version, and for games/emulators. But for everything else it's a risk on companies.
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on 6/11/24, 9:18 AM
I do not like binary packages. I prefer to compile the source myself. If the program is too difficult to compile then I am less inclined to use it. Needless to say I am not a Windows user.
by avhception on 6/11/24, 8:59 AM
by frankjr on 6/11/24, 9:40 AM
If you want to stick to Debian, you could try switching to Debian Testing and have newer packages (although the mention "syncthing" is not at the latest stable version there either).
by brodouevencode on 6/11/24, 1:57 PM
I don't agree with the problem or the solution, but flagging it just seems emotion-driven.
by kevsamuel on 6/11/24, 10:36 AM