by gaudat on 6/7/24, 6:45 PM with 112 comments
by throw46365 on 6/8/24, 12:36 AM
The nurses obviously couldn’t respond to it each time, but nor could they switch it off altogether, and it didn’t reset after any period of time.
My siblings and I took turns to gently hold his arm down on the side of the bed… which became just holding his hand, which I still miss.
by ijustlovemath on 6/8/24, 3:21 AM
The use of these alarms is not something imposed by the manufacturers, but by the standards, eg 60601, 62304 etc. For devices involved in diagnostic, or more importantly interventional care, you are required to have alarms within certain auditory and visual thresholds, and a lot of them have mandated silence times (in a life critical system, you can only silence a true alarm for 120 seconds at a time).
Then again, "ALARM" as dictated by the standards means something truly emergent, though the wording can feel a bit fuzzy at times. Trust me, alarm fatigue is a known phenomenon to these manufacturers, and theres been a recent trend (with, eg, the Dexcom G7) of giving users more control over delaying alarms, silencing them until you can respond etc etc, which has its benefits, especially as quality of life is concerned.
You'll have a hard time convincing the FDA of this for critical devices like those found in hospitals though.
by LorenPechtel on 6/7/24, 7:41 PM
I was once in the recovery room with my wife. For some reason the sensor was having a very hard time reading her pulse. The normal bips would frequently fail. Too many failures in a row and the alarm would start it's EEEEEE scream we've all seen from Hollywood. It would shut up as soon as it managed to pick up a beat.
Hers was definitely not the only one in the room occasionally screaming. The nurses were completely ignoring it. Quite understandably so as it was obviously doing false alarms. But in a flood of false alarms like that are the real ones going to be noticed??
by tux3 on 6/7/24, 8:00 PM
Contrast with the GPWS warnings in aviation, which tells you what the problem is (TERRAIN TERRAIN) and what to do (PULL UP) in a progressively more alarmed voice as things get worse.
(Well.. Sometimes you hear of some particularly bright individuals who think the bank angle warning is a checklist item, but it's generally hard to get these wrong, compared to many other beeping warnings)
by blackeyeblitzar on 6/7/24, 8:17 PM
My take - the medical industry has too many barriers to competition, and it is too difficult for people who work with these things to do anything about it as well. It’s unclear who the buyers are at a hospital or how a startup could reach them. It’s also unclear what sort of interoperability (for example with Epic for charting) is needed. Regulations also make it difficult to get devices approved and investors are less likely to support a startup in this space.
by tverbeure on 6/7/24, 8:34 PM
It’s a low volume but high margin business. Some of the issues were the constant fight against the factory not following design requirements to cut costs, knockoffs etc.
by strnisa on 6/7/24, 9:46 PM
It seems to me that clear verbal alerts like "BLOOD PRESSURE VERY HIGH" could be more immediately understandable than tones. A hybrid system combining verbal alerts with alarm tones might be a good compromise for clarity and international usability.
by odiroot on 6/7/24, 7:15 PM
by kioleanu on 6/8/24, 7:57 AM
by davidw on 6/7/24, 8:14 PM
by ano-ther on 6/7/24, 8:31 PM
Unfortunately, I cannot find the article anymore.
by jill4545 on 6/8/24, 7:14 AM
by chess_buster on 6/8/24, 8:47 AM
by bouvin on 6/7/24, 7:30 PM
Though a bit disappointing that there is no machine that goes PING! [1]
by g15jv2dp on 6/7/24, 8:02 PM
by userbinator on 6/8/24, 3:44 AM
by roughly on 6/7/24, 9:19 PM