by clessg on 5/29/24, 12:38 PM with 63 comments
by mrdoops on 5/29/24, 7:45 PM
And there's also a scale to 0 story for when you're not using that GPU at all: https://github.com/phoenixframework/flame
1 language/toolchain. 1 deployable app. Real time and distributed machine learning baked in. 1 dev can go really far.
by davidw on 5/29/24, 5:45 PM
This is a genuine question - I don't know much about "AI stuff", but do know something about the economics of programming languages and I'm "intellectually curious" about what is driving this and what the goals are, rather than critical of Elixir. I love working with BEAM and miss it.
by bnchrch on 5/29/24, 4:58 PM
Really cool to see the concerted effort in parallel going into both ML problem space, and into introducing typing.
by djaouen on 5/30/24, 6:36 AM
by melodyogonna on 5/29/24, 8:19 PM
by dpflan on 5/29/24, 10:15 PM
""" These features bring Numerical Elixir and its ability to setup distributed model serving, over CPUs and GPUs, to traditional meachine learning algorithms, allowing developers and data practitioners to tackle a wider number of problems within the Elixir ecosystem. """
by Dowwie on 5/30/24, 1:27 PM
by behnamoh on 5/29/24, 8:58 PM
Even with Haskell you have something like ghcup and you're good to go. Not to mention Rust's amazing Cargo and Go's tooling as well.
So far, Elixir has been even more challenging to just get up and running than Common Lisp!
By the way, the official Elixir website recommends using Homebrew to install it. But almost everyone in the Github issues and comments says ASDF is the way to go.
by bluevlahblah on 5/29/24, 6:10 PM
Take explorer, it’s a mess trying to implement dplyr verbs in elixir. Anyone trying to use it is going to hit its limitations sooner or later. I tried migrating to it from polars but it is too frustrating.. gave up after some time.
Why will people use half baked libraries instead of python ? I will stick to Keres/pytorch, polars, etc