by ehPReth on 4/11/24, 6:18 PM with 68 comments
by h2odragon on 4/11/24, 6:36 PM
Preservation of things like this, ephemeral history, is important. Everybody recognizes that immediately: "hey what a good idea if someone would save that stuff". The actual doing gets harder.
i got a stack of 17 years of "PC magazine" somewhere; easy to find people who say "oo cool i'd love to look through those" but much harder to find anyone willing to come pick them up.
by cranky908canuck on 4/11/24, 10:44 PM
The most memorable comment was in the blog of a buyer of collections. Can't find the link but paraphrased: "I will never even look at a collection that has had anyone else peruse and buy some discs. They bought your collection." As in, most 'collections' are really 'accumulations', the dealer will buy your accumulation and give you psychological cover that someone really values all of it, but keep the valuable stuff and bin the rest --- and first do an assay that there are indeed some gems in the ore.
Also, "If you recognize the performers, it's not of any value".
I see so many records at thrift shops that make me think "Crap, did I drop that off by mistake in my last move" that I have to concede that the fate of my collection will be the replacement of fossil fuels. As a classical listener and collector, I am nontheless moving to a (cynical?) assessment that a lot of those collections are "the music you were told you should enjoy".
Yep, it's heartbreaking. This thread makes me think about what the real goal should be, given that the material media is merely fuel. Maybe a short document about the things that I want to charge the beneficiaries with giving a listen to?
by noobermin on 4/11/24, 6:23 PM
by Lerc on 4/11/24, 8:01 PM
I would willingly gift them to good homes, I feel my role is as a custodian. I cannot make use of these things, but I can ensure that they continue to exist.
I can completely sympathise with the anger that the author of this post feels. They were performing this custodial role and the expectation in passing to a new custodian is that they preserve the material or pass on to a new custodian. I'm sure if faced with the option of destruction or taking back the donation the author would have taken it back.
by amichlin on 4/11/24, 10:03 PM
Everything was checked for archiving. Everything was offered to anyone who would listen for over a year. Most of the paper found a good home. In fact, a better home as the warehouse is near the ocean and has no climate control. Not a good place to donate paper. It should never have been donated and should never have been accepted (under previous management).
I was actually there. Nothing in this blog post is factual.
by nxobject on 4/11/24, 9:31 PM
by strict9 on 4/11/24, 8:20 PM
This is more of an insult than a consolation. I'm still in disbelief that they were tossed out rather than offered back or donated elsewhere.
by amatecha on 4/11/24, 7:09 PM
by D13Fd on 4/11/24, 6:31 PM
by navjack27 on 4/11/24, 6:41 PM
by WhitneyLand on 4/11/24, 6:41 PM
Was the issue about disrespect, the loss of the periodicals, mismanagement, or a combination? It doesn’t say.
by prosaic-hacker on 4/11/24, 8:13 PM
If a billionaire funded museum could run into trouble (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34831880) what hope is there for anything else.
PS. I have a cache of ~10,000 1980s and 90s DIP ICs (8032 Micro controllers and support chips) that I want to find a use for. You could contact me at my account name without the punctuation at gmail.
by 2four2 on 4/11/24, 6:23 PM
Resource Limit Is Reached The website is temporarily unable to service your request as it exceeded resource limit. Please try again later.
by stronglikedan on 4/11/24, 6:30 PM
by jazzyjackson on 4/11/24, 6:55 PM