by Kluggy on 3/14/24, 5:53 PM with 58 comments
by faeriechangling on 3/14/24, 8:15 PM
by superbman on 3/14/24, 8:29 PM
I play so few games that I'm happy to buy mostly from the much smaller gog.com. I'm not sure if their fees are less, but it at least raises competition.
I generally don't trust DRM platforms like Steam or Epic, but bravo to Tim Sweeney for championing smaller publishers unable to negotiate down from Steam's 30% fees.
by ganoushoreilly on 3/14/24, 6:52 PM
It just comes off as greedy and whiney.
by blibble on 3/14/24, 8:39 PM
it's a direct result of its private ownership, there is no need to constantly squeeze customers/suppliers for more every quarter
if it was owned by a VC/PE fund, or a public company then it would be very different experience indeed
by MR4D on 3/14/24, 8:57 PM
He is fighting everyone's 30% fees.
Perhaps, just perhaps, they are worth it because if they weren't the it would be easy to create a platform.
Proof of his absolute stupidity is here [0], where he says (referring to MS, Nintendo, and Sony), "* Well, they subsidize hardware, so they sell their hardware, as far as I can tell from widely published reports, at a loss, and so the fee needs to cover that*".
WTF???? So if you lose money, the he isn't going to sue you, but if you make money, then he will sue you. At this point, I hope someone destroys his damn company due to a slip & fall lawsuit. God, I can't take his shit anymore!!!
[0] - https://www.gamesindustry.biz/epic-explains-why-it-hasnt-sue...
/rant