by akarambir on 5/9/12, 9:16 PM with 48 comments
by yangez on 5/9/12, 11:22 PM
Because of this, Facebook has the potential to develop a more accurate app recommendation engine and solve the problem of app discovery. If Facebook can make their platform more merit-based than the capricious Apple App Store, both users and developers will flock to them.
And this isn't even considering Facebook's social graph. Not only could Facebook recommend apps based on your demographics + interests, it could also recommend them to you based on how much you previously liked the games that some of your OTHER friends liked. Things like this could add a whole new dimension to app discovery - all completely exclusive to the Facebook platform.
by bobwise on 5/10/12, 1:20 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner-platform_effect
"The inner-platform effect is the tendency of software architects to create a system so customizable as to become a replica, and often a poor replica, of the software development platform they are using."
by cmelbye on 5/9/12, 10:25 PM
by acanby on 5/10/12, 3:02 AM
I think the big question is - what happens for paid apps? Will Facebook be asking for a cut of any referrals? Take Draw Something for instance, which is $1.99 (or free). I know Facebook gets benefit from people playing and using Facebook Connect, but they have essentially handed that store the sale. I would think they would want to monetize this, and will be interested to see how this plays out. I wouldn’t be surprised if agreements are in place - as it would really be of mutual benefit.
by bgilroy26 on 5/9/12, 10:27 PM
Is the consensus that Google Play has too many free apps and they need to move many more apps for the same $ volume? Should app stores be working to establish a more enterprise-y (Amazon and Microsoft) or sophisticated (Apple) culture so that customers expect to spend money?
How serious is the potential for one successful store to sell HTML/CSS/Javascript apps that start eating the other stores' lunches?
Is Facebook in good shape because others' apps won't run directly in its domain? Or is it more vulnerable because it has so many vendors working against it to make "sticky" apps that could pull them away from the Facebook experience altogether?
by masonhensley on 5/9/12, 9:51 PM
Or is this just a showcase for Facebook enabled applications (native & web.)
by soup10 on 5/10/12, 2:37 AM
by nigham on 5/10/12, 12:53 AM
by chadyj on 5/9/12, 10:11 PM
by lakshmibalu on 5/10/12, 5:34 AM
by Tyrant505 on 5/10/12, 1:21 AM
by spaghetti on 5/9/12, 10:12 PM
Wonder what this means for the App Center running on iOS?
by zomgbbq on 5/10/12, 3:14 AM
> 2.7 Apps that download code in any way or form will be rejected. > 2.8 Apps that install or launch other executable code will be rejected
by GuiA on 5/10/12, 5:23 AM
I've been convinced for a couple years now that Facebook's next big thing will be a Facebook phone (likely based on Android, but partnering with a single manufacturer).
by captaincrunch on 5/10/12, 1:11 PM
by hkmurakami on 5/9/12, 10:22 PM
Google: Android Marketplace
Facebook: App Center
If you take all combinations of similes for "App" and "Store/Market/Center/Hub" and trademark all of them, I wonder if some random company could become a trademark troll.
by wilfra on 5/9/12, 10:56 PM
This is the beginning of the end for Zynga. Quality will now drive users to new games, not news feed spam and who has the biggest userbase to promote to or the biggest marketing budget.
Bravo Zuck! Though I suspect Zynga's declining growth led to this decision more than them wanting to level the playing field.