by jasonlfunk on 2/15/24, 4:21 AM with 50 comments
by Timothee on 2/15/24, 6:01 AM
As if David Copperfield had an idea to make the Statue of Liberty disappear. He has a plan he thinks will work, but it doesn’t. So instead, the audience is made entirely of stooges. And we’re made to believe that they’re all random people.
Or it works, and he can actually put random people for whom the illusion will work!
Either way it only really works on TV if you believe that the live audience is real. If it’s a fake audience, anyone can do it, and it’s not interesting. (there are many well known magicians who use stooges and/or camera tricks all the time)
I feel the same here. The very reason people liked the video was the process he presented, not just the result. So lying about it is lame.
And I think it's unfortunate because he could have posted almost the same video with just saying "and… it didn't quite work! So I edited my real yarn logos and threads to get the final clip" and it would still be a cool result.
by spencerflem on 2/15/24, 5:10 AM
by jonhohle on 2/15/24, 4:58 AM
I’m not sure why he would even “fake it” in the first place. Part of making something is the journey to get there and often an initial idea doesn’t work out, or a better way is discovered once the work begins. That’s what I enjoy about watching makers: how they pivot when they run up against a wall.
by Jimmc414 on 2/15/24, 5:23 AM
by curiousgeorgio on 2/15/24, 5:23 AM
But this project wasn't about making a Netflix logo animation; it was about using a fun, low-tech method for achieving a similar result. The whole point of the project was the method, not the result.
So if he had taken shortcuts when making the original Netflix logo animation, there would be absolutely nothing wrong with that. But claiming that he used a specific, unconventional approach to do this (focusing on how he did it, not what he did), then lying about that for clicks... that's pretty disgraceful in my opinion.
by neom on 2/15/24, 5:17 AM
Like it or not, stuff like this has been the norm in the art world since forever.
by po on 2/15/24, 5:27 AM
by from-nibly on 2/15/24, 2:28 PM
by MichaelMug on 2/15/24, 5:35 AM
by yen223 on 2/15/24, 5:14 AM
a) it's easy to lie with videos, and
b) videos are still way more trustworthy than any other media on the internet because those are even easier to fake
It's not hard to think that you really shouldn't rely on the internet as a source of truth for anything anymore.
by dvsfish on 2/15/24, 5:31 AM
Good exercise in not blindly accepting things, which is arguably more valuable than a cute Netflix homage
by AndrewKemendo on 2/15/24, 5:31 AM
Which means its probably not an actual problem but was good subterfuge to get more attention
So, well done kayfabe and that got a follow on life for something (At least I) had no idea existed let alone had a problem with.
by Mathnerd314 on 2/15/24, 5:36 AM
by bitwize on 2/15/24, 4:49 AM
by cyberdrunk2 on 2/15/24, 5:13 AM
Creative success isn't always about sticking to the plan. It more often than not looks like finding alternate solutions and being flexible in the face of challenges."
This touched me, no lie
by serial_dev on 2/15/24, 5:57 AM
IMO it's deceiving and dishonest to fake an elaborative creative process and tell the viewers it's something that it isn't.
On the other hand it's also a good reminder that only because a puppy eyed artsie guy makes a 7 minute documentary-style video that looks completely honest and believable, it doesn't automatically make it honest and true.
It was time I learned that, I added the "arts behind the scenes" category videos to the fake prank videos, pickup videos, political commentary, and product reviews. Everyone lies.
by not_your_mentat on 2/15/24, 2:43 PM
by zoklet-enjoyer on 2/15/24, 5:46 AM
by em-bee on 2/15/24, 5:49 AM
by apapapa on 2/15/24, 5:33 AM
by mmaunder on 2/15/24, 5:34 AM