by awesomekling on 2/12/24, 8:58 AM with 55 comments
by ofrzeta on 2/12/24, 2:50 PM
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36620450
However I don't understand why many people are longing for Ladybird as another free browser. There are already some and Firefox is losing marketshare every day. So please do use it.
Ok, I guess Mozilla Foundation's running the Firefox project is not to everyones liking, so that would be a valid reason. But not to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Firefox is a great browser and the only reason I sometimes use Chrome is that more and more sites require Chrome (e.g. Teams).
by robador on 2/12/24, 6:17 PM
This is fine.
Seriously though, that's insane.
by andrewstuart on 2/12/24, 5:54 PM
No doubt it’s possible to build a simple web browser that gets some 50% of the job done and could serviceabley display some websites.
However there would a very very long tail of detail and nuance and edge cases that would be very very hard to catch up.
This is why you should use Firefox and we should never lose Firefox.
If you don’t follow it closely, the pace of new feature development in web browsers is stunning. There is a huge amount of new stuff going in constantly.
I’m not knocking this project….. developers can build whatever they like. I’m just observing that the web browser is already the Pyramids of Giza or some other such gigantic human endeavor.
by yogorenapan on 2/12/24, 2:23 PM
by fifilura on 2/12/24, 5:32 PM
More likely would have been that it was non-compliant but chrome renders it anyway.
And from there starts the work of figuring out how exactly to make it bug-compliant with Chrome.
by epgui on 2/12/24, 5:18 PM
by tantalor on 2/12/24, 5:54 PM