from Hacker News

Notes on a few abnormalities in analysis (2022)

by dante44 on 1/10/24, 8:40 PM with 6 comments

  • by fiforpg on 1/11/24, 1:55 AM

    Gelbaum-Olmsted Counterexamples in analysis is a standard reference for various pathological examples in analysis:

    https://archive.org/details/counterexamplesi0000gelb

  • by xyzzyz on 1/11/24, 4:23 AM

    Cantor's set always messes with my mind.

    Say you start with the standard construction: take closed interval [0, 1], then remove open middle third, then remove two open middle thirds from two remaining segments, then remove 4 open middle thirds from 4 remaining segments, etc countably many times (more formally, intersect all of the sets you obtain in each of the step).

    Intuitively, what remains should be the end points of the removed intervals, but this is not true: since at every step you removed finitely many intervals, and there were countably many steps, you removed finitecountable <= countablecountable = countably many intervals, so there are only countably many many ends of removed intervals, but the Cantor's set is uncountable. So where do the remaining points come from?

  • by blt on 1/10/24, 10:49 PM

    > Things fall apart when the space is not compact. Your sequences may converge but not to an element in your space.

    This is about closedness only. ℝ is not compact but contains its limit points.