by neural_thing on 1/2/24, 3:27 PM with 78 comments
by cjs_ac on 1/2/24, 5:21 PM
> with what he got, instead of partying, went to Edinburgh to get a first class education in moral philosophy
Scotland was the place to get such an education at the time.[0]
> decided to get elected. went to a very corrupt district where votes were bought for five guineas. campaigned on principles. lost heavily but paid all those who voted for him ten guineas after the fact. next year campaigned on principles again and won. when people came to him for the ten guineas, said “The former gift was for their disinterested conduct in not taking the bribe of five pounds from the agents of my opponent. For me to pay them now would be a violation of my own previously expressed principles”
Prior to the Reform Act 1832[1], each town with a Royal Charter had the right to elect two burgesses to the House of Commons. There were numerous 'rotten boroughs', such as Old Sarum, whose two burgesses were chosen by just seven electors, the rest of the population having moved downhill to Salisbury in the thirteenth century, or Dunwich, once one of the most important towns in England, but now washed away into the North Sea. Elections were not secret, and in rotten boroughs, electors could be bribed individually. Manchester, a bustling settlement of one million inhabitants by the time of the Act, on the other hand, was not chartered, and consequently had no burgesses in the Commons at all.
by benrules2 on 1/2/24, 6:21 PM
by stnmtn on 1/2/24, 4:52 PM
by hansjorg on 1/2/24, 11:52 PM
For a similar naval hot shot, check out Peter Tordenskjold (lit. thunder shield):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tordenskjold
There are lots of amusing stories about his crazy deeds, but he employed people to do PR for him, so take it with more than the usual grain of salt.
by bbarnett on 1/2/24, 6:49 PM
This one confuses me. Anyone know what this means?
by awei on 1/2/24, 5:17 PM
by tbm57 on 1/2/24, 5:48 PM
by peter_d_sherman on 1/4/24, 6:16 AM
>"with what he got, instead of partying, went to Edinburgh to get a first class education in moral philosophy"
And, insert another continuing list of highly questionable, immoral activities -- after the above entry...
This particular entry, if true, would portray this historical character -- as a rather humorous historical character, who was, at least, somewhat hypocritical! :-) <g> :-)
(But who knows? Perhaps he needed the class in moral philosophy to learn about what hypocrisy is, and how it works! <g> :-) <g>)
Anyway, the article is an excellent biographical summary of a very colorful historical character!
by foldr on 1/2/24, 5:48 PM
by niccl on 1/3/24, 1:32 AM
by flobosg on 1/2/24, 5:52 PM
by l2silver on 1/3/24, 4:06 PM
by btilly on 1/2/24, 8:13 PM
by lucas_membrane on 1/3/24, 5:48 PM
by rraghur on 1/3/24, 1:45 PM
by bandrami on 1/3/24, 6:22 AM
by elnatro on 1/2/24, 7:56 PM
This made me chuckle.
by porkbeer on 1/3/24, 5:30 PM
by Log_out_ on 1/4/24, 1:52 PM
by n4r9 on 1/2/24, 5:04 PM
Cochrane sounds like a very unique character, but after the first few bullets I just wants to go and read his Wikipedia page.
by paxys on 1/2/24, 9:47 PM
- Of breaking up a paragraph
- Into a hundred individual sentences
- And fragments
- We really have Twitter
- To thank for this