from Hacker News

The Tyranny of Possibilities in the Design of Task-Oriented LLM Systems

by dhruvdh on 1/2/24, 1:05 PM with 3 comments

  • by dhruvdh on 1/2/24, 1:05 PM

    Full Title: The Tyranny of Possibilities in the Design of Task-Oriented LLM Systems: A Scoping Survey

    Description: It is a survey that tries to identify our current progress in designing task-oriented LLM systems - how informed we are when we make decisions about prompting, augmentation, etc. It lists several such design parameters, describes them, and explores varying these parameters through a thought experiment (!). Then we select three parameters (prompting, augmentation, and uncertainty estimation), try to define them, and organize select available research on these topics. Our definition and organization differ slightly from what you'd expect as we try to avoid overlap in each parameter.

    Later, we discuss what we find, defining "linear and non-linear contexts", and using it to show how all (?) prompting techniques can be viewed as multi-agent systems, and speak about the implications of that - one of which is on synthetic data generation which the HN community might be interested in. In all, the paper shares seven conjectures to help guide future research efforts.

    I will list these conjectures in a comment for those short on time.

    Thank you for reading!

  • by kk58 on 1/4/24, 5:15 PM

    LLM are fundamentally stateless. The exoskeleton of agents is essentially a work around to enable a state that resides externally to a LLM. This is required in some manner for creating an agent. Task oriented agents require reasoning and planning but the nature of its wildly different compared to the kind of behaviour that is observed in the interactive simulacra paper. Your ideas have merits but I feel it needs to have some further qualifications