by schalkneethling on 12/29/23, 4:22 PM with 103 comments
by elric on 12/30/23, 8:11 PM
by tyoma on 12/30/23, 7:52 PM
Relatedly, is this another instance of HN serving as de-facto Google tech support/customer service?
by ademarre on 12/31/23, 9:30 AM
https://www.cloudsek.com/blog/compromising-google-accounts-m...
by shadowgovt on 12/31/23, 2:30 AM
Google engineers weren't keen to implement the feature in the first place, and it's been kind of an unlimited well of headaches, confusion, and user issues ever since.
by candiddevmike on 12/30/23, 10:58 PM
by rolph on 12/30/23, 7:46 PM
https://www.infostealers.com/article/lumma-malware-can-alleg...
by motohagiography on 12/31/23, 12:10 AM
It sounds related to an OAuth2 footgun around applying the expiry to refresh_tokens in addition to the access_token, which has an explicit expiry. Whereas the refresh_token expiry is only implied as something less than the access_token - if any.
by DeathArrow on 12/31/23, 9:22 AM
by HackerThemAll on 12/31/23, 11:04 AM
So this is schizophrenia - corporation is protected, but casual Gmail users are left to be hacked with no option to set the session expiration anywhere in the account settings.
by robocat on 12/31/23, 9:13 AM
I guess Mac and Android users are potential victims too. As much as I despise post-Wozniak Apple, at least an iPhone is reasonably secure (except from governments).
by rezonant on 12/30/23, 8:17 PM
Of course maybe I'm wrong but short of some more compelling technical details (reply a link if there's a better source), I'm inclined to doubt the characterization of this article.
EDIT: Sibling linked https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malware-abuse... which is more technical.
by Sparkyte on 12/31/23, 12:51 AM
My life has always told me nothing is secure.