by devadvance on 12/22/23, 6:40 PM with 15 comments
by ajb on 12/22/23, 9:33 PM
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-detecting-unwant... (This is NOT a suggestion to replace the story link, as from there you can get to the docs GitHub, mailing list etc)
Others can be selected at the top of the main link. This seems to be the second rev of a draft.
(Having now read it)
One interesting point is that non owners get to disable locators if they are moving with them. Which makes sense to allow people to disable hostile trackers, but it also means a thief can disable it. May be the right call, but it does mean a ready market for noncompliant devices will exist unless this is put into law
by fmajid on 12/25/23, 11:09 AM
Also, since Apple’s Find My network is open to third-party manufacturers, unless they have some authentication mechanism, there is nothing preventing a manufacturer from defecting and implementing a tracker that uses the network, is not detectable by not having a beeper, but still implements the rest of the protocol to be locatable.
by khaki54 on 12/25/23, 4:57 AM
These consumer grade air tag and tile devices are a practical way to track all your things, but allowing people to disable them or even alerting to their presence kind of defeats the purpose.
by happeecaw231 on 12/26/23, 6:41 PM
by dkjaudyeqooe on 12/22/23, 11:47 PM