by eklitzke on 12/6/23, 9:22 PM with 21 comments
by pyuser583 on 12/7/23, 1:59 AM
My favorite in-person programmer group was disbanded over a purely theoretical debate about the Code of Conduct.
About 30% of the group decided we were being exclusionary by not incorporating very specific, and in my opinion exclusionary, language.
However the same 30% had no problem attending a reconstituted group containing exactly the same people which formed a few weeks after the first group disbanded.
The new group has no code of conduct. It simply meets in places that have a preexisting set of rules, and we go by whatever they are.
Problem solved.
by x-complexity on 12/7/23, 3:21 AM
No person should ever be in charge of it.
by grungyneer on 12/7/23, 5:49 AM
In general, I wish there were a wider variety of CoCs. Yes I can be super nice, but it might be nice to work in a team that is brutally honest with each other and takes nothing personally. I have the stomach for it and, if someone else doesn't, they don't have to participate. Of course such a CoC would be excoriated by the mob.
by lifthrasiir on 12/7/23, 6:34 AM
May you do good and not evil.
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
The Code of Ethics can be thought as its natural extension, not merely a knee-jerk reaction to various Codes of Conduct.by tomlockwood on 12/7/23, 6:30 AM
by droopyEyelids on 12/7/23, 5:00 AM
Actually on second thought, its fine to exclude those from a mission focused collaborative coding space.
Take jokes and drunkeness to a different medium
by jj999 on 12/7/23, 5:13 AM
by Mountain_Skies on 12/7/23, 4:23 AM
But like I said, I have zero proof of this. Perhaps it's better as a screenplay than an explanation of how things are going but it certainly wouldn't surprise me if there's some truth to it, at least with some FOSS projects.
by treadmill on 12/7/23, 6:24 AM
by marginalia_nu on 12/7/23, 3:07 AM