by theNewMicrosoft on 12/4/23, 5:56 AM with 55 comments
by stareatgoats on 12/5/23, 8:24 AM
Using this method this study might just prove, or at least insinuate, that the survivors of the Second Plague Pandemic that earned higher incomes and could afford higher-calorie foods are in fact possibly responsible for a "wide range of chronic diseases, including obesity, cardiovascular disease and poor mental health".
To their credit, they won't investigate the teeth of pre-industrialized people "without the permission and collaboration of decedent populations and stakeholders".
I'm not saying nothing good will come out research such as this. It is just interesting that it contains so much irrelevant signaling.
by gumby on 12/5/23, 10:21 AM
I assumed from the title that the oral bacteria would reveal some preferential defense or resistance to yersinia pestis, but instead it was entirely due to the post-epidemic economies of the survivors.
This is more like the situation of beriberi crippling the imperial Japanese navy in the 1880s
by yosito on 12/5/23, 12:45 PM
by anovikov on 12/5/23, 12:29 PM
by estiaan on 12/5/23, 11:09 AM