by vishnuharidas on 11/25/23, 9:06 PM with 31 comments
by makach on 11/25/23, 10:15 PM
I already used GPT to help me tutor my kids, and for my kids to use it when they get stuck. They get unstuck faster. They are critical but also more willing to accept response as fact, we discuss this regularly and they seem to be getting the point.
so many kids get left behind because a teacher is unable to spend time with them, how amazing will it not be for each student to have their own supporting teacher?
hopefully, we will be able to harness AI for the better and good.
by sugiero on 11/25/23, 10:46 PM
The op is saying “I learned <TECHNICAL_JARGON>” but did they? How are they quantifying learning? How do they know what they “learned” is even correct.
I agree with the headline but I think it needs a qualifier of “in the presence of an educator”. The educator, can be a technical text, is there to sanity check the conversational agent.
In my experience the best use of such agents at this time is in a domain where I’m already an expert and I want it to do some remedial work or lookups for me.
by smoldesu on 11/25/23, 9:26 PM
by ren_engineer on 11/25/23, 10:21 PM
When combined with the ability to run code and read images I think it will really help with learning math. Show it your work, have it tell you why you got a wrong answer, and then it can tell you the concepts you need to review
by arikrak on 11/25/23, 11:24 PM
by mattkantor on 11/25/23, 11:00 PM
by leobg on 11/25/23, 11:34 PM
The big disclaimer is that you can really only do that with subjects that you already know very well. Then again, precisely that can be part of the fun. Because it is fun to see where the model gets it right, vs where some details are in conflict with something you know from other sources.