by algobro on 11/4/23, 5:17 PM with 27 comments
by jey on 11/4/23, 5:35 PM
https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/separating-turmeric-...
https://qz.com/india/883829/a-large-scientific-review-study-...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-assay_interference_compoun...
by underseacables on 11/4/23, 5:47 PM
Typically, it's followed by something along the lines of "if only big Pharma/government would get out the way, we could have this valuable cure."
If something actually has efficacy, then a drug company would've made it into a drug by now. Somehow it would have gotten to a point of treatment somewhere in the world. I'm just not seeing that, so until it actually is put through real-world testing with patients, I think everyone should look at these with some doubt.
by graphe on 11/4/23, 5:32 PM
Wikipedia suggests its toxify is overblown. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead(II)_chromate
>Despite containing both lead and hexavalent chromium, lead chromate is not particularly toxic because of its very low solubility. The LD50 for rats is only 5,000 mg/kg. Lead chromate is treated with great care in its manufacture, the main concerns being dust of the chromate precursor. "Extensive epidemiological investigations have given no indication that the practically insoluble lead chromate pigments have any carcinogenic properties".
by jchanimal on 11/4/23, 5:34 PM
by algobro on 11/4/23, 5:17 PM
by amriksohata on 11/4/23, 9:01 PM
by tmaly on 11/5/23, 1:58 AM
by meindnoch on 11/4/23, 5:33 PM
by mmh0000 on 11/4/23, 10:59 PM