by siftrics on 10/21/23, 10:25 PM with 215 comments
STARLINK intermittently tries to phone home by hitting 3G towers.
Now that 3G is shutting down, the digital communications module (DCM) gets stuck in an infinite loop of
1. Phone home, expending battery charge 2. Fail, because 3G doesn't work anymore 3. Go back to step 1
This effectively remotely drains the battery of every Subaru Outback built between 2015 and 2020.
Even if you drive your car every day, its battery will die and you won't be able to start it.
Other models are probably affected, too.
There was a class action lawsuit. But this is a pretty egregious engineering oversight, given they were still producing defective cars in 2020, hardly two years before 3G flipped off.
Will a brand ever produce a reliable, mechanical car? Why should 3G towers have anything to do with my car being able to start?
by adambatkin on 10/22/23, 1:02 PM
Previously, there were times that I would drive 100 miles one day, and I couldn't even open the doors using the automatic locks on the following day. It's been about a month on the new DCM and so far I haven't had any issues, so here's hoping...
by johnklos on 10/23/23, 3:02 PM
Discussion would then lead to what to do about it, and busy-waiting in a loop trying to contact cell towers again and again would certainly not be a solution.
But can a corporation do this? Apparently not. I honestly wonder if designers are actively discouraged from caring about anything beyond the projected life of a product, because it could negatively impact later sales.
by greenyoda on 10/22/23, 8:11 AM
https://www.tsbsearch.com/Subaru/WQZ-61R
It mentions a "3G Sunset Update".
A further search for "3G Sunset" turned up a few TSBs that apply to various Subaru models and years.
You can search for TSBs here: https://www.tsbsearch.com/Subaru
by hulkmusic on 10/22/23, 2:56 PM
Everything I've read online about the issue points to the STARLINK system, and the common wisdom in this thread and elsewhere is to pull the DCM fuse. Unfortunately, my Forester has no such fuse, so I'm at a loss what to do with my car.
It's so frustrating, because my wife has a Subaru Crosstrek of the same year that has never had a battery problem, even with the OEM battery. She has a base model without any additional "upgraded" electronics, so that's the likely culprit in my case. I'm currently on my third or fourth higher CCA battery and had to jump it again a few days ago.
I haven't taken my car to the dealer for the parasitic drain issue, but previously tried to get dealership service for an unrelated entertainment system issue related to USB media playback freezing up the entertainment system. That fix was unsuccessful, and I have no faith in Subaru mechanics being able to diagnose and fix a potentially more nebulous battery drain issue. It doesn't help that the dealership is now 45 minutes away, so I'm not interested in wasting even more time on a hit and miss solution.
Ironically, I bought Subaru because reliability was my number one concern when purchasing a vehicle, and I'm not sure I would do that again.
by Lio on 10/22/23, 8:05 AM
Then keep coming back to get the battery replaced when it "fails to hold charge".
If every owner did that it would end up like the region restriction in DVD players.
i.e. The retailers would force the manufactures to turn it off because they don't want to deal with the cost of fixing an artificial problem.
Oh and I would start posting to car websites and forums about how unreliable my car was. Marketing teams do care about getting that reputation.
by otterley on 10/22/23, 6:48 PM
2016-18MY Legacy/Outback 2016-18MY Impreza 2016-18MY Crosstrek 2016-18MY Forester 2017-18MY WRX
See https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2021/MC-10189606-0001.pdf for details. And, yes, Subaru is reimbursing dealers for this work.
by morkalork on 10/22/23, 5:27 PM
by bicepjai on 10/22/23, 6:39 AM
by RecycledEle on 10/22/23, 6:56 PM
1. All vehicles with 12v starter batteries should also have deep cycle batteries to power the accessories. Chevy Suburbans had that for decades, but some people laughed at vehicles designed to actually run and drive. That's fine. Enjoy the vehicle you picked.
2. It's my car darn it. Any and all communication with it needs to be easily read by my in plain English. I also need to be able to veto any communication, in an easy-to-use, plain English system. This second option would require legislation. The new law should apply to everything made. If the owner is also the operator, then the owner can read and veto all communications.
3. In the interest of national security, all products made must have a minimum of reliance on the outside world. Those connections that do exist must be as standard as possible. Once against, this requires legislation.Any device that refuses to operate without an Internet connection should be illegal. Phone-home DRam should be illegal.
We get what we deserve. The only downside to my ancient pickup truck is that I have to clean the hybrids out of the wheel wells about twice a month.
by totetsu on 10/22/23, 7:36 AM
by alphabettsy on 10/22/23, 11:03 PM
The solution is to put a carabiner or similar in the latch so it believes it’s closed.
Completely ridiculous issue with an otherwise great vehicle.
by SanjayMehta on 10/22/23, 7:42 AM
Better to go with one which pairs with your phone if you even need this functionality.
by bsbdbkeks66554 on 10/22/23, 4:16 PM
by ashirviskas on 10/22/23, 3:44 AM
by seeg on 10/22/23, 7:29 AM
by CrendKing on 10/22/23, 7:15 AM
by ksec on 10/22/23, 7:31 AM
by op00to on 10/22/23, 1:29 PM
by nzealand on 10/22/23, 4:37 PM
by CrankyBear on 10/30/23, 5:47 PM
by manuelabeledo on 10/21/23, 11:01 PM
by bobchadwick on 10/24/23, 2:57 PM
I reached out to Subaru of America and as a one-time "goodwill gesture," they refunded me for the cost of the DCM.
by doktorhladnjak on 10/23/23, 5:47 AM
by lathiat on 10/22/23, 7:45 AM
I took it to New Zealand on roaming and despite having a connection it spent so much time looking for the home network (“Three” in Australia) the battery would last half a day.
by block_dagger on 10/22/23, 8:41 AM
by DLA on 10/25/23, 1:12 AM
by onewheeltom on 10/23/23, 11:48 PM
by WirelessGigabit on 10/22/23, 7:48 PM
by userinanother on 10/21/23, 11:35 PM
by Der_Einzige on 10/22/23, 6:05 PM
by mjan22640 on 10/22/23, 5:19 PM
by cushpush on 10/22/23, 3:25 PM
by Noumenon72 on 10/22/23, 4:29 PM
Is this a different Starlink from the Elon Musk one?
by Kon-Peki on 10/22/23, 5:12 PM
So while I totally believe this is killing batteries, I also believe that these cars have more electrical problems than just this.
by faebi on 10/23/23, 6:54 PM
by kenaz on 10/28/23, 9:15 PM
by scarface_74 on 10/22/23, 7:12 PM
by sasaf5 on 10/23/23, 9:25 AM
Take a look at Dacia.
by uberman on 10/21/23, 11:31 PM
How do you figure this? Seems unlikely to me that a 15 min drive would not bring a car batter drained my occasional failed phone connections back to full
by smoyer on 10/22/23, 6:03 PM
by EMCymatics on 10/22/23, 8:03 PM
by egberts1 on 10/23/23, 4:52 PM
-- Slick marketing.
Always pay attention to Consumers Report ratings.
by mouse_ on 10/21/23, 10:42 PM
by rootsudo on 10/22/23, 8:26 AM
by tetrti7475 on 10/22/23, 8:35 AM
- install small solar panel behind back window. That will trickle charge battery, and will counter ballance drain
- hard switch off on battery, disconnect battery everytime car is not used for couple of days (weekend).
by clnq on 10/22/23, 4:51 AM
For the sake of infinite growth, many lines have been crossed and many decisions that make no sense if not looked through the lens of money have been made.
I think companies will start doing truly unethical things in the pursuit of this in the future. What if the dashboard could show ads before the car starts? It’s just a second of your time. What if a gas station network like Circle K could sponsor your car so it tells you to get a specific type of gasoline? Why not subscription for “optional” safety features that were standard? Why not a way to remotely disable cars with a warning light on the dash “for your own safety” until they visit a certified dealer? Why not coded car parts so the customer gets a “genuine product” and doesn’t “accidentally” install a cheaper generic counterpart? Why not pay as you go features instead of paying upfront? Why not track places you drive to with your car, the conversations you have in it, the people you call, and whether you drive with your wife and/or kids for behavioural advertising elsewhere? What about an eco mode subscription that saves you money when compared to not buying it, despite that it is always free with cars today?
Maybe we could also disable some people’s cars to align with certain political demographics and identities, like we cancel, deplatform, and get people fired for slights online now? Could that paint us in a positive light in certain demographics? One client lost for a thousand gained!
Maybe an auto-911 crash detection subscription? You wouldn’t want to be the mother whose kid dies in a car crash so you’d save $19.99 a month, would you? Anything if it moves more cars or at a higher marginal revenue, right?
And let’s not forget marginal costs - what could be cheaper? Maybe some parts are too durable. A lot of things could be digital - break lines, steering, the accelerator, door locks, seat belt mechanisms, mirrors and so on. And we could save doubly by outsourcing all this work to the cheapest bidder, whether they specialize in automotive safety or web design.
Anything for the sake of growth. And it’s coming. Sooner or later, there won’t be a company in the auto industry providing appealing returns unless they charge their users more, exploit them more, or save up for a nicer dividend by cutting some corners. Not today, not this year, maybe not in the immediate future. But this is the natural conclusion of the flavor of capitalism we do.
I don’t blame capitalism for everything. It’s good for a lot of things. But it totally fails humanity when large corporations are involved. We should change it before a bunch of our industries collapse under their self-destructive behaviors driven by greed. Because right now, a good investment strategy is to constantly keep investing in companies who irreparably harm themselves and their customers long-term for a quick buck. You just need to build your portfolio of these and dump them once their sell-out is over. And this makes money. An investor would be unwise not to pick a money-making strategy.
It is in everyone’s best capitalistic interest to exploit others to the max. And when all that could be exploited is, well… no one managing companies thinks about this. The investors want returns now, all the time. The executives know how to sell-out for this and golden-parachute into the next company to do it all again. The employees are laid off and customers are mistreated, but hey - capitalism is to acquire capital. It’s not called moralism.
by simonebrunozzi on 10/22/23, 8:03 AM