by hker on 10/11/23, 3:53 AM with 65 comments
by dhx on 10/11/23, 4:57 AM
The jurisdiction of the authors of this article appears to be Victoria, Australia where it is illegal to record audio and visual images of someone's private conversations or private space at home[1] without a law enforcement reason. Similar applies to other jurisdictions of Australia. Aside from the obvious legal problem, I doubt businesses would want to deal with the potential liabilities of recording and storing footage of someone's kid running past a camera in the background of an employee's home without clothes on, or recording a private conversation an employee has with their lawyer relating to a family law matter.
Many Australian organisations would also be reluctant to provide their own employee's access to video surveillance footage from cameras in public locations. There would generally only be a small handful of employee's with access to recorded footage. There is a significant possibility of misuse resulting in negative media attention and fines for the organisation. There is also a cost issue. The more an organisation records, the greater the chance they'll have to respond (at their own cost) to a law enforcement request or response to a court proceeding to reveal the footage.
[1] Part 2, Surveillance Devices Act 1999, https://content.legislation.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2...
by elromulous on 10/11/23, 4:11 AM
by retSava on 10/11/23, 5:12 AM
So I have to assume that for some reason that forwarded email was supposedly interesting and there's either a filter to forward, or they manually log in and forward what's interesting. Either way, getting it in my face is pretty off-putting.
Thinking of forwarding that email and add "hey, your surveillance is misconfigured, but here it is anyway".
by andersa on 10/11/23, 5:00 AM
Do the large companies usually let you do that at all?
by kristopolous on 10/11/23, 4:34 AM
The book is fine btw... Not the greatest but fairly prescient
by oaiey on 10/11/23, 4:42 AM
I think privacy (for different reasons) is a key part in that.
by nunez on 10/11/23, 1:02 PM
What's better: being on your work computer for 14 hrs/day producing nothing of value and/or taking meetings that you're at best a passive observer in, or being on your work computer for 3 hrs/day hitting and exceeding personal/team goals and driving tons of value and spending the remaining 5 work hours living life while being available?
I hope we can collectively move away from time-spent-working as the measure of productivity.
by pfisherman on 10/11/23, 5:09 AM
Is it that hard to whip out a mobile phone / tablet when you need to conduct some personal business or procrastinate?
This goes hand in hand with the more general principle of maintaining strict compartmentalization between work and personal life. My personal time, devices, online accounts, etc are mine.
by mistyvales on 10/11/23, 4:31 AM
by EarthAmbassador on 10/11/23, 4:26 AM
If only managers would set goals, and let workers achieve them as best they can.
by asdefghyk on 10/11/23, 4:05 AM
by chmod600 on 10/11/23, 4:37 AM
by blairanderson on 10/11/23, 4:20 AM