by valeg on 10/7/23, 1:15 AM with 44 comments
by robertlutece on 10/7/23, 7:51 AM
"There's a collector's item - a double-o-two number!" said Lasher. "I've known several single-o men, but never a double-o. I guess you're the highest classification I ever had friendly words with. If the Pope set up shop in this country, he'd be only one notch up - in the R-numbers of course. He'd be an R-001. I heard somewhere that the number was being held for him, over the objections of Episcopal bishops who want R-001 themselves. Delicate business.
by defrost on 10/7/23, 4:10 AM
The first figure reflecting social status, and the second – social level, reflecting “merits” and “prospects”, respectively.
by kgeist on 10/7/23, 6:34 AM
>Of course, the platform represents an interesting experiment that can lead to new approaches to assessing the social status and standard of living of citizens. However, it is necessary to ensure transparency, data protection and a balance between individual rights and state interests
by ddmma on 10/7/23, 5:29 AM
When you reach the obsolete status then what? Also this applies to public authorities? https://youtu.be/zGZqnc6_5To?si=BsHSPxDB0-NYp-Rs
by kbelder on 10/7/23, 4:04 AM
by pharmakom on 10/7/23, 7:25 AM
by more_corn on 10/7/23, 3:42 PM