by v1l on 10/1/23, 9:12 PM with 13 comments
There is clearly a need for on-demand, as-needed help for specific projects, launches, or for team augmentation. Companies (especially small and mid sized) have been more open to hiring freelance and remote since Covid, especially for shorter durations and point projects.
I keep thinking that a lightly vetted but less onerous than Toptal, less race to the bottom than Upwork platform for tech talent and companies can absolutely flourish.
Curious what you all think?
by freelanceTA on 10/2/23, 4:27 AM
For me any kind of freelance Toptal like site needs to be specific about hours they expect you to be available as most people will be doing it P/T after school, or whatever other job they're doing. There is of course the problem with clients not paying, then your site is on the hook to pay the developer.
by sawadees on 10/1/23, 11:20 PM
Through a lot of trial and error, coming up from sites like Upwork, Fiverr, etc. That's the only way I feel that "freelancing" works for me. Where I am deeply networked and have already build rapport with the clients.
by vladmk on 10/2/23, 4:22 AM
This is because people go to freelancers for 1. Speed 2. Quality 3. Temporary work
If something is temporary and you want it fast then a majority of the time you’ll want it cheap.
BUT you could find a really small market that wants to go fast and expensive - it’s just much smaller
by meiraleal on 10/1/23, 11:31 PM
by perfmode on 10/1/23, 9:27 PM
Your post prompted to check out Toptal. I signed up. What's so onerous about Toptal?
by akg_67 on 10/1/23, 10:40 PM
What do you think the reasons are for lack of a platform in the middle?