by vanilla-almond on 9/5/23, 2:33 PM with 83 comments
by weeksie on 9/7/23, 1:13 PM
* People who have no business writing and have no idea what they're doing. These are not going to give you much, which is why you want to keep to groups that have some gatekeeping.
* Beginners who are not that talented but can develop skill. These people are good because you can see what it looks like to go from nothing to something, even if that something isn't great
* Untalented people who are workhorses and can do the job: these people are probably the most valuable "bad writers"
* Talented people who suck. These people are also amazing because you can see the power of skill as it develops
* Talented people who are very good. (These won't be in your group)
But really all this about "analyze why the book sucks" is a red herring. What is far more instructive is understanding why something that you don't like is appealing. If you can find what works in something you don't like, it's a lot more likely that you'll be able to understand that technique.
Best selling thrillers with bad dialog and paper characters? Great. That means you can focus on the pacing and plot and understand why the book works despite its obvious flaws. That's harder though because it isn't just stroking your own ego by saying "aw I could do that"
by suzzer99 on 9/7/23, 7:58 AM
I always tried to study her, thinking that if I could understand the essence of why she was so deeply unfunny, I could understand the secret to being funny.
Sadly I could never figure it out. Her unfunniness was inscrutable.
by circlefavshape on 9/7/23, 10:08 AM
Right at the start there's a scene with a bunch of people in a nightclub, and when describing someone he uses the phrase "with a face like a bulldog licking piss off a nettle" - a colloquial phrase in Ireland meaning someone looks sour (see https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Face%20like%...)
... but he misplaced a comma, and the sentence he actually wrote was
"Maria, of course, standing close by with a face like a bulldog, licking piss off a nettle."
Terrible book, but almost worth reading just for that image
by 1letterunixname on 9/7/23, 5:52 AM
PS: Also, have a plain dust jacket. Never nuclear pink, orange, or yellow.
by atleastoptimal on 9/7/23, 8:11 AM
by cocacola1 on 9/7/23, 5:17 AM
Jokes aside, though, Moore is probably a top 10 author for me. I don't think I've read anything of his that I haven't enjoyed, and what I have read, I've enjoyed heads & shoulders above – and remember much more in detail, thanks to the book nature of it all – anything else.
by fumeux_fume on 9/7/23, 4:42 AM
by touisteur on 9/7/23, 1:16 PM
And then, the bastard manages to turn his stories around and do something often good, sometimes great of it. Not sure whether it's on purpose or he's just a short-story stretching too much... But if you read most of it, it's very very bad. But add the endings or the small moments of grace and suddenly it's great. Ugh.
by Borrible on 9/7/23, 8:57 AM
by cafard on 9/7/23, 1:02 PM
by watwut on 9/7/23, 9:50 AM
Focusing on other people faults and trying to avoid them made me super aware of any theoretical imperfection in what I was doing without making me able to do something actually good. I was not improving at all, I was just increasingly scared to do anything, because more and more words/acts whatever resembled something bad someone have done.
by nottorp on 9/7/23, 7:59 AM
by kristopolous on 9/7/23, 5:52 AM
by Ekaros on 9/7/23, 8:47 AM
by bowsamic on 9/7/23, 1:56 PM
by tzury on 9/7/23, 8:40 AM
by Octokiddie on 9/7/23, 3:02 PM
by lsmeducation on 9/7/23, 7:56 AM
by greenie_beans on 9/7/23, 2:27 PM