by askura on 8/30/23, 4:10 PM with 96 comments
by beauHD on 8/30/23, 4:55 PM
That's within reason though. A VPN is another ISP afterall, so they have to 'bow down' to law enforcement requests. What LEAs can get depends on how zero knowledge the VPN setup is. OVPN[0] for example has been 'court tested' and Mullvad had nothing to give to authorities[1] since they don't collect it in the first place (apart from payment metadata).
I'm not affiliated with OVPN or Mullvad, just a happy paying customer.
[0] https://www.ovpn.com/en/blog/ovpn-wins-court-order
[1] https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/4/20/mullvad-vpn-was-subjec...
by minimalist on 8/30/23, 4:43 PM
I think something that is missing in the network of connections is Mozilla VPN. From what I understand, they are just a re-brand of Mullvad.
There are other providers not listed, but finding a good VPN provider is kind of like finding a good watering hole--you don't want to spread the word too widely, else bad-actors come and pollute it.
I didn't realize how many media companies own VPN companies.
by askura on 8/30/23, 4:11 PM
The reference article for the map itself with key updates & findings: https://blog.windscribe.com/the-vpn-relationship-map-2023/
by acheong08 on 8/30/23, 4:30 PM
by qwertox on 8/30/23, 5:24 PM
Is this a thing? I recall hearing about it around two years ago.
Something along the lines of "ISPs Give 'Netflow Data' To Third Parties, Who Sell It Without User Awareness Or Consent" [0] or "How Data Brokers Sell Access to the Backbone of the Internet" [1]
[0] https://old.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/pbdvp3/isps_give_n...
[1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/jg84yy/data-brokers-netflow-...
by infogulch on 8/30/23, 4:48 PM
by clsec on 8/30/23, 5:37 PM
I also could not find their name on the map. It doesn't mean that it's not there, I just couldn't find them. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
The only thing I find a VPN useful for is torrenting w/o your ISP knowing. In my case, I use Surfshark for torrenting so that Comcast can't send me any of those pesky letters.
by Ms-J on 8/30/23, 11:11 PM
Also, does anyone know of a privacy conscious VPN provider that currently supports port forwarding? One of the only provider's I know of right now is ovpn.com and I cannot vouch for their privacy practices.
by unforgivenpasta on 8/31/23, 1:42 PM
by mantra2 on 8/30/23, 5:33 PM
by yieldcrv on 8/30/23, 5:12 PM
because the VPN concept has limitations. It doesn't matter if the favorite VPN has proof of stonewalling a court case at some point in time, any other point in time it can be undermined and you wouldn't know until its too late....
it relies purely on trust and your use case. but if your use case ever expands to something law enforcement would be interested in, the VPN concept relies on too much trust
by KomoD on 8/30/23, 5:17 PM
and speedtest vpn == ipvanish
mozilla/firefox vpn == mullvad
by tamimio on 8/30/23, 9:13 PM
by TheCaptain4815 on 8/30/23, 5:15 PM
I remember going down the rabbit hole and people online were skeptical unless the company had a proven FBI raid with no logs taken, haha.
by ecmascript on 8/30/23, 4:50 PM
by szundi on 8/30/23, 4:41 PM
by candiddevmike on 8/30/23, 4:43 PM
by j3th9n on 8/30/23, 4:24 PM
by the_third_wave on 8/31/23, 10:52 PM
by cisasteelersfan on 8/30/23, 5:17 PM