by louismerlin on 8/11/23, 3:49 PM with 51 comments
by iSloth on 8/11/23, 7:10 PM
GSMA are actively attempting to lockdown them existing methods, as they’re built on trust in a very untrustworthy environment between carriers, and in some cases state actors.
Sure on the face of it this isn’t brilliant to the average HN reader, but with context it’s a significant improvement vs where we are today.
by Johnie on 8/11/23, 8:29 PM
Here are some articles:
* https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/12/10/business/loca...
* https://readwrite.com/loc-aid-the-biggest-location-s/
* https://www.technologyreview.com/2011/12/09/189247/startup-t...
by tamimio on 8/11/23, 7:41 PM
>Traffic management of drones: the Uncrewed Aircraft System Traffic Management or the drone operator can obtain drone location information from its GPS data, however this is vulnerable to jamming or spoofing. They can query the API to verify the drone location, e.g. for law enforcement purposes or to check compliance with approved flight plan.
That’s not the real use case since not a single drone (commercial or consumer) is using the builtin GNSS in the modem (if any as most don’t even have modems) as they are usually weak compared to professional ones, the real reason is
> or to check compliance with approved flight plan.
There! Quick background: consumer drones like DJI are easily trackable by DJI AeroScope [1] which is actively used by police to track these drones in specific events, and now FAA is also requiring the remote ID is an extension to that to cover other drones. However, that doesn’t cover all drones, you have a sub-category of drones that are un-trackable, not easily anyway, the ones that fly over cellular networks, which is a challenge to know since from network perspective it’s just another UE, so what’s the easiest way to know?! Exactly, the builtin gnss, a quick query and you can tell, although I’m still not sure how they will distinguish the normal UE from drone UE. So I wouldn’t be surprised that people are disabling the builtin gnss either by the AT commands or just disconnecting the antennas.
by michelangelo on 8/11/23, 5:28 PM
Ah! Meeting information are also included... you know, in case one is interested in attending.;-)
by barbazoo on 8/11/23, 5:32 PM
I'd say this can only "give away" the location if you already roughly know where someone is AND no rate limit exists.
by hexo on 8/11/23, 6:09 PM
by dfox on 8/11/23, 10:28 PM
by tamimio on 8/11/23, 6:07 PM
by Nextgrid on 8/11/23, 5:38 PM
Hopefully by the time this is rolled out, GDPR enforcement would’ve actually caught up and forced them to make it opt-in only.
by zeroCalories on 8/11/23, 6:18 PM
by recursive4 on 8/11/23, 7:55 PM
by mdwalters on 8/12/23, 5:59 AM