by finphil on 8/11/23, 2:35 PM with 71 comments
by Dystopian on 8/11/23, 3:27 PM
All of the media's coverage up here is disingenuously about tech overreach and not about how their lobbyists tried to double-dip on revenue (both demanding an estimated $329M/year[1] from tech companies, while also receiving the ad revenue from ++1.9B pageviews[2]).
The problem is there'll probably be some kind of settlement between the government, news companies, and tech. But while this drags on, the larger oligopoly of news outlets will come out alive, while smaller news outlets are really going to suffer financially.
If you want to read more about our government's recent brain-dead policies on technology you can look up:
C-11: A streaming services bill that mandates Canadian content on foreign streamers. Not horrible, but also a great way to have "This service is not available in your region." notices in your country.
DST: A "just because" global digital services tax of 3%, which will definitely be passed onto consumers, if not lead to service blockages in Canada.
C-18: ↑ This bill. Pretty much a shakedown by the government and media companies.
> This is coming from a registered liberal party member, who's socially liberal and is consistently confronted with the thought that I may actually be conservative.
[1] https://www.pbo-dpb.ca/en/publications/RP-2223-017-M--cost-e... [2] https://about.fb.com/news/2022/05/how-meta-supports-news-pro...
by unsubstantiated on 8/11/23, 3:07 PM
by MAGZine on 8/11/23, 3:11 PM
An example of this is where meta has basically "regionally suspended" some news accounts. Some Canadians (a/b testing) going to Instagram pages owned by a News Orgs see "sorry, blocked, bitch at the government." But the law doesn't say news orgs can't use social media unless Meta pays them.
It's not the first time Canada has seen this sort of bad behaviour from entitled companies. I've seen literally this overapplication strategy in other instances.
Perhaps the law should be tweaked. Perhaps it should not be. But this actively damages my view of Meta. maybe the fact they hate this so much is an indication the government is doing something right.
Maybe Canadians will be inspired to get their own news instead of consuming whatever viewpoint Meta deems acceptable (and yes I think actual domestic journalism is a better source than Meta).
by 1024core on 8/11/23, 3:01 PM
Well, Canada fucked around and found out.
by seryoiupfurds on 8/11/23, 3:53 PM
I'm sure glad the government is focusing on important issues like this while being dismissive of the housing crisis.
by kemayo on 8/11/23, 3:14 PM
by lacksconfidence on 8/11/23, 3:06 PM
by thefurdrake on 8/11/23, 3:26 PM
How, exactly, will that cause a reduction in competition in the market? I think it's GREAT that a cancer peddler like Meta is removing itself. Neat.
... I hate being on Meta's side, but the Canadian authorities have truly taken leave of their senses.
by SllX on 8/11/23, 2:57 PM
by lambersley on 8/11/23, 4:04 PM
by xeckr on 8/11/23, 3:42 PM
by ChrisArchitect on 8/11/23, 4:10 PM
Here's the discussion from 5 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37025233
by nemo44x on 8/11/23, 3:19 PM
What’s going on up there?
by blastonico on 8/11/23, 3:01 PM
Oppressors becoming oppressed?
by goodbyesf on 8/11/23, 3:12 PM