by necolas on 2/28/12, 3:58 PM with 23 comments
by ajanuary on 2/28/12, 4:44 PM
I guess with discipline I can train myself to always think about things like the rhythm created by font-size and margins on headers, but I've not experienced the downsides of a full reset yet.
by jsdalton on 2/28/12, 6:26 PM
I found it a bit curious though that they don't dogfood it on their Github page (http://necolas.github.com/normalize.css/), but I guess that's not a huge deal or anything.
by bcullman on 2/28/12, 10:02 PM
by stepeight on 2/28/12, 4:16 PM
by pbhjpbhj on 2/28/12, 6:37 PM
So if Konqueror 3.42 [made up version] has a bug giving a default of double the normal padding on h1 then I have to specifically check that this is addressed by the attempted normalization.
>"Normalize.css is an alternative to CSS resets. The project is the product of 100′s of hours of extensive research by @necolas and @jon_neal on the differences between default browser styles."
Makes me think that I'm going to need to update every site using this with every new browser version that has a pixel difference in it's default style; a situation that a reset just works on.
Of course resets are subject to browser bugs too but it seems that they are more robust and more likely to just work ...?
by gioele on 2/29/12, 12:25 PM
That is a strong claim given that the "modularisation" is realised adding banner comments in the CSS. I think it would had been better to have separate @import'ed files. Those worried about performance could use minificators while other, like me, could just use the parts they are interested in, in my case
@import 'normalize.css/html5-fixes.css'
@import 'normalize.css/html5-defaults.css'
by run4yourlives on 2/28/12, 5:38 PM
That said, a reset file is always a good idea, and this is a nice evolution thereof.
by ars on 2/29/12, 5:47 AM
by hluska on 2/29/12, 3:47 AM
by chmike on 2/28/12, 9:08 PM