by bentaber on 6/14/23, 8:32 PM with 41 comments
by contrarian1234 on 6/14/23, 8:53 PM
Is the web interface representative of the final quality?
Just looking at an example: https://www.apolloremastered.com/shop/p/as15-82-11056-to-110...
Even mildly zoomed in the image looks quite crummy and blurry. Fine for a postcard, but not to hang on you wall
It's also a bit weird that some dude manages to somehow get semi-exclusive access to photos made by the US gov't and can then charge hundreds of pounds for them
by evolve2k on 6/14/23, 8:38 PM
by akiselev on 6/14/23, 8:41 PM
by hex4def6 on 6/14/23, 9:20 PM
Wow, they got the Apollo 15 crew to sign these? Awesome! There are some technical / logistical issues with that, but I'm sure they managed to overcome them...
Snark aside, I'm not really sure how running restoration on public domain photographs gives you authorship / copyright ownership over them.
by _caw on 6/14/23, 9:17 PM
Every page is filled with these georgeous, highly detailed pictures, and a running commentary from the astronauts or author.
You won't be disappointed.
by WirelessGigabit on 6/14/23, 9:45 PM
What? Since when is a film developer an artist?
If he would've taken the photos himself and then did the post-processing... fine. But not like this.
I'm reading this page: https://www.apolloremastered.com/shop/p/s65-30427 and it doesn't even mention the original photographer.
by jjcm on 6/14/23, 8:36 PM
by KleinDisk on 6/15/23, 12:09 AM
>The scans of this original flight film have been digitally remastered in a lossless format and then converted to laser / LED light
"Lossless encoding" is a red herring if you are looking for fidelity to ground truth, see:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22802909
amongst others
by clnq on 6/14/23, 11:13 PM
by grout58 on 6/14/23, 9:04 PM