by yoseph on 2/6/12, 7:46 PM with 28 comments
by yannickt on 2/6/12, 8:13 PM
Also:
"The old model of financial advisors, mutual fund managers and brokers is dying fast."
Is there any evidence to support this? I.e., are mutual fund managers making less money? And if formally trained investment professionals, as an aggregate, are not good at managing money, is it reasonable to think that individuals will do better with a code academy for stocks?
by veyron on 2/6/12, 9:31 PM
by DevX101 on 2/6/12, 8:03 PM
Its never a bad idea for individuals to learn some basic code.
by IceCreamYou on 2/6/12, 9:01 PM
It turned into a silly little linear game. We realized that intelligent investment in the stock market requires setting up advanced models that require math beyond what most people can manage. If you're not working with such a model, you're probably losing money to the people who have one. There are some general concepts to learn about the stock market that don't have to do with math, but they're mostly pretty obvious and hard to make into a fun, game-like format.
by rayhano on 2/6/12, 8:25 PM
by corkill on 2/6/12, 10:13 PM
Stock picking is essentially staking your money on something which you have no control over. I'm not against people learning about it. But yeah tons of better things to learn about, don't think it would take off. Seems like something to cover this would need to be more like an ongoing game and a lot less like code academy lessons.
Why do stock analysts, market experts etc even exist when they can hardly predicate things better than the average investor? Because there is a demand for them.
by andr on 2/6/12, 8:27 PM
With finance, there is not one generally proven way to make money. Once you get your feet wet in a financial market, there are no rules on how to make money or value stocks and other investment instruments. Experienced finance types lose money all the time. Someone that only completed an interactive learning game is bound to lose their savings.
by nirvana on 2/6/12, 8:17 PM
So, I think the first thing that you'd need to do for such a startup, is to limit your audience to people who are independant thinkers, people who want to invest themselves and want to take control over their financial lives and haven't given up on the idea that they can be successful doing so.
This may have been obvious when you were writing the RFS, but I'm not sure what percentage of the market that is.. and if you want to address the whole market, you've got a lot of myths to deal with. (like the idea that the market is efficient, or that individuals can't pick stocks, or that mutual fund managers are better at managing money.)
Or, put another way, maybe the first module in such a system would be disproving these myths.
by nirvana on 2/6/12, 8:40 PM
It lets you go back in time and buy or sell on specific dates in the past. This allows you to back test mechanical strategies. But for working with real time events, paper trading lets you make your trades with no knowledge of the future, see how you do as time goes on and have no money at risk.
Always a good idea if you're going to do anything with increased leverage (like shorting or options).