by krn on 4/5/23, 1:26 AM with 27 comments
by throwaway290 on 4/5/23, 2:42 AM
To me as a Russian (though I read the English translation) the part where he really never talked about it with mom rings true sadly. Watching TV is a good indicator too.
Also, made me feel a bit better about not thinking a war would begin, contrary to US intelligence, if even this guy (who saw Putin in person many times apparently?) did not see it coming.
I worry about this guy and his family by the way. I almost wish he didn't go public and draw attention for his family's sake. But I applaud the move.
by exabrial on 4/5/23, 2:44 AM
by orloffm on 4/5/23, 7:55 AM
This is just so naive. And people in the US Secret Service casually discuss how bombing Syria is wrong? Of course it's like that in those circles, people are selected by that criteria.
by memalign on 4/5/23, 8:55 AM
I guess this 2018 article from the AP gives it _some_ legitimacy… https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ap-top-news-london-i...
by southernplaces7 on 4/5/23, 4:13 AM
by beardog on 4/5/23, 3:29 AM
by bitsinthesky on 4/5/23, 5:28 AM
by secondary_op on 4/5/23, 9:03 AM
In comparison, USA with its national state security policy and foreign power would never allow for any individual to destabilise country from foreign land for so many years.
NGOs give the impression that they are filling the vacuum created by a retreating state. And they are, but in a materially inconsequential way. Their real contribution is that they diffuse political anger and dole out as aid or benevolence what people ought to have by right. They alter the public psyche. They turn people into dependent victims and blunt the edges of political resistance. NGOs form a sort of buffer between the government and the public, between empire and its subjects. They have become arbitrators, the interpreters, the facilitators. In the long run, NGOs are accountable to their funders, not to the people they work among. They're what botanists would call an indicator species. It's almost as though the greater the devastation caused by neoliberalism, the greater the outbreak of NGOs. Nothing illustrates this more poignantly than the phenomenon of the US preparing to invade a country and simultaneously readying NGOs to go in and clean up the devastation. In order to make sure their funding is not jeopardized and that the governments of the countries they work in will allow them to function, NGOs have to present their work in a shallow framework, more or less shorn of a political or historical context. – Arundhati Roy, the Indian writer, about the NGO influence in India.[2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Khodorkovsky[2] https://socialistworker.org/2004-2/510/510_06_Roy.php#Top
by HiHelloBolke on 4/5/23, 3:05 AM