by JackWebbHeller on 1/28/12, 10:51 PM
The whole debate is frankly embarrassing for both sides... Of course, admittedly more so for Curebit - but I can't be the only one who thinks that DHH's cocky attitude, publicly tweeting things like "Fucking scumbags", is just embarrassing when he is the main face of a friendly and professional company like 37Signals...?
by allangrant on 1/28/12, 10:36 PM
The actual apology:
Recently we launched a site with several pages copied from 37signals' Highrise. We did more than take inspiration from their design - we actually used html & css code, and hotlinked to images on their site. We apologize to David and 37signals for ripping off their work. It was stupid, lazy, and disrespectful of their creative efforts. It's particularly painful for us to have done this to 37signals because they are big heroes of ours. We just hope they will accept our apologies.
by trotsky on 1/28/12, 11:55 PM
I wonder how the community reconciles so many posters being up in arms about this event while frequently promoting stories from torrent freak and generally dismissing the belief that much harm comes from copyright infringement. Is it different when someone you know or respect is the injured party?
by Kique on 1/28/12, 10:38 PM
"Recently we launched a site with several pages copied from 37signals’ Highrise. We did more than take inspiration from their design – we actually used html & css code, and hotlinked to images on their site. We apologize to David and 37signals for ripping off their work. It was stupid, lazy, and disrespectful of their creative efforts. It’s particularly painful for us to have done this to 37signals because they are big heroes of ours. We just hope they will accept our apologies."
from Google cache
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?sclient=psy-ab&...
by guynamedloren on 1/28/12, 11:27 PM
I hope they're A/B testing their apologies, because that one sucked.
by dkrich on 1/28/12, 11:38 PM
The thing that amazes me most about this whole debacle is how completely unnecessary it was. Web designers are popping up everywhere like fucking mushrooms, and these guys (presumably pretty intelligent) chose to just steal a design.
Developing a nice-looking design is the easiest part of a startup. Generating the idea, interest, and funding is what stalls 98% of them. They had all that, but screwed up on the most doable aspect of the company. That alone greatly calls into question the judgment of the founders (not to mention the moral implications).
by petercooper on 1/28/12, 11:05 PM
I'm sure I've seen the design of that "Error establishing a database connection" page somewhere before..
by jbrowning on 1/28/12, 10:44 PM
by chris123 on 1/28/12, 10:41 PM
Pretty good apology Dave McClure wrote for them.
by atacrawl on 1/28/12, 11:49 PM
To everyone who thinks DHH and 37signals overreacted to this, keep in mind that the IA/UI paradigm introduced in Basecamp has been aped by
many startups in their web apps with nary a whiff of public complaint.
It's one thing to copy the design of a marketing page (which is pretty weak), but to serve assets from that company's servers? Such an action is so idiotic and pathetic, that it's absurd. It's completely inexcusable and deserves to be called out whenever it happens.
by sachingulaya on 1/28/12, 10:37 PM
You should probably edit the title to "Apology to 37signals, Kinoma, and LaunchBit"
Edit: The LaunchBit image is a stock photo. I apologize.
by jetsnoc on 1/29/12, 4:18 AM
I think @dhh wasted a great opportunity to be a leader and a mentor. I think he should have asked allengrant to rise to the occasion. Instead he was incredibly rude and shared his contempt publicly!
It all seems so incongruent to me. On one side of the coin, 37s wants to share their results openly but on the other using the idea they shared makes him "a fucking scumbag." I understand there is a copyright violation involved. However, I suspected 37s would have been more... tactful.
Unfortunately, this is the second time 37signals has disappointed me in the last few weeks. As a customer, they violated my sense of privacy and almost as worse one of their partners is a total hot-head. Personally, and this is only my opinion based on no fact...In the back of my mind I am thinking "what would a hot-head that does not respect my companies privacy do with our information?!" To think I used to look up to them!
by Hominem on 1/29/12, 2:32 AM
I almost feel bad for these guys but I understand why DHH was so pissed. Getting inspiration or even straight up stealing the HTLM and CSS is one thing, but referencing assets on 37signals servers is beyond the pale as 37signals is paying money to serve those assets.
This happened to a company I worked for, a company not only ganked our website but used pictures of our offices and staff we had on our about us page!
by Vaanir on 1/28/12, 10:54 PM
by alexobenauer on 1/28/12, 10:53 PM
by n9com on 1/28/12, 10:50 PM
Looks like they didn't spend their $1.2m on getting a decent web server either - website down.
by romain_g on 1/28/12, 11:05 PM
No matter how people on both sides react, they are all at the very least decently smart persons and an acceptable apology shouldn't be only a place for redemption. I can't imagine people at Curebit assuming that the ripoff wouldn't be discovered. So why did they do that?
by anon22342 on 1/29/12, 12:50 AM
Can someone explain why this is such a big deal? Genuinely curious. It seems the HN hivemind has a much stronger response to someone stealing a web designer's work vs, say stealing a Hollywood studio's work and hiding behind DMCA safe harbor.
by gumbo on 1/29/12, 12:44 AM
I stumble upon stolen graphics so much time, when a company is not able to create an original landing page, how one can expect that company to create something more complex. This is not to say curebit won't succeed, but as one said "we are in a hard world" and people are looking where you succeed but also where you fail. I hope this mistake will be the last one until the go bigger otherwise i'm afraid the won't be forgiven one more time.
by eightysteele on 1/29/12, 5:25 AM
Minor nit, but what stuck me most about the apology was that Allan didn't include a link to
http://37signals.com.
by ssharp on 1/29/12, 2:27 PM
It's nice that they apologized, but aside from the ethics behind what they did, I think I'd be extremely weary of using Curebit. If they are lazy enough to directly copy HTML/CSS and not even go through the bother of copying images to their own server, where else are they cutting corners?
by jaimoepelle on 1/29/12, 7:35 AM
Has anyone heard from 37? Curebit is good tech that works, they have been more than fair in the few dealings I have had the privilege to work with them on. They, like most companies constantly change... how many logos did Google have. Rather than an indictment on them I see it as on the community. More help, more share, less complaining about things that really don't matter. In today's world product matters, template design is secondary to the many things they are doing daily to make a business. and 37 is the one company that goes out of their way to share what works and encourages startups to use their advice. So curebit made yet another change to their homepage...who cares save the few who tear down cause they cant build up. Allan, u created a great product, u made ur clients more money and are positioning yourself to lead a great new company. Commended u are, and your success will have nothing to do with the design of your homepage....if it were that easy.
by joshontheweb on 1/29/12, 3:01 AM
Inexcusable but not a bad move in the end. This will all settle and be forgotten except that everyone will remember their name. Unethical and unwitting but a good publicity stunt nonetheless.
by auxbuss on 1/28/12, 10:47 PM
by ddw on 1/29/12, 3:51 AM
Copying someone's layout, jacking a logo and mentioning A/B testing are seriously all it takes to get millions of funding???
I'm on the next flight out to the Valley!
by eduardordm on 1/29/12, 1:39 AM
Learned:
- Some people will actually steal your CHECK icons
- Over-bashing a stealer will not make you look nice
- Immediatism never seem to work on your side
by manojlds on 1/28/12, 11:06 PM
The best way to break a site is to have it come on the front page of Hacker News!
by gumbo on 1/29/12, 12:48 AM
I think DHH did it the wrong way, it is such an arrogant reaction. it is not like Curebit is a concurrent or something like that so they could have just sent an email asking remove the elements.
That's been said, but if this embarrassing event help someone to never ever steal elements again then it's is a goo thing.
by soapdog on 1/29/12, 12:32 AM
Anyone has a friendly link to a summary of what happened?
by crikli on 1/29/12, 1:58 AM
Humility on either side would have gone a long way.
by provokeme on 1/29/12, 8:07 AM
Curebit who? Not anymore. Well played.
by mindslight on 1/28/12, 10:56 PM
And where's the apology from 37signals, venturebeat, and the submitters for helping to turn HN into TMZ?
by pg_bot on 1/28/12, 10:40 PM
The blog is down, I am getting "error establishing a database connection"
by mattaus on 1/29/12, 7:01 AM
Worst apology ever!
by denysonique on 1/29/12, 5:18 AM
Lean startup
by shareme on 1/28/12, 11:14 PM
Unfortunately, blog author did not get the lesson.. 37Signals was ONLY ONE-OF_SITES that Cutebit stole from..
Thy have clear habit of doing so
by FredBrach on 1/28/12, 10:32 PM
It seems the blog is completely down.
by tbsdy on 1/28/12, 11:15 PM
Database connection error...
by jsavimbi on 1/28/12, 10:50 PM
Don't you have a Google+ account you could've posted it to instead of trying to host it in your own? Are you seriously trying to micro-manage your damage control this way?
I thought they vetted these people or something and would have a damage control recipe in place after the AirBnB debacle last year.
by humbyvaldes on 1/29/12, 12:04 AM
Startup Metrics for Pirates: AARRR! and steal peoples shit lol
by curiousfiddler on 1/28/12, 11:13 PM
Man! Curebit is definitely very wrong, but all those abuses just don't make a pretty read on my twitter feed. I am gonna unfollow DHH. I respect him a lot for what he's achieved, but all that profanity leaves a very very bad taste.
Personal learning: never abuse. Those words mean nasty things.
by pnmahoney on 1/28/12, 11:39 PM
I don't think anyone has a final answer, but really _how close_ do designs have to be so as to lack integrity?
(assuming that they hadn't straight up lifted the CSS, images, button etc... which they did, which is clearly wrong.)
Ex: DHH says http://elance.com is inspiration, not theft. Ok.
Ex 2: A more difficult edge is http://coursekit.com I instantly recalled their design after seeing this scandal, although I'd initially taken note of it for its effectiveness.
Their similarity to basecamp is on the front page only, and no assets stolen. (full disclosure: competitor, vaguely, for a hackathon-started education product I'm working on.)
Like, we can think up a MILLION edge cases. That's not the point. I'm really, really curious to hear what you guys think the difference IS.
and please, please, PLEASE don't respond to this with vitriol on other side. if you think there are problems happening here in the way we treat design, and how ppl react, just DON'T add to it in that way.
EDIT: edited to match repost, because of downvote(?) here