by ptr on 3/12/23, 7:39 AM with 21 comments
by Symbiote on 3/12/23, 1:20 PM
And this article compares figures from various sources, which aren't all in agreement: https://www.thelocal.dk/20230310/fact-check-did-sweden-have-...
by jadamczyk on 3/12/23, 8:30 AM
by slaw on 3/12/23, 12:50 PM
That's the opposite to other countries, where covid-19 mitigation was handled by media and bureaucrats.
by erwald on 3/12/23, 1:15 PM
- https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-deaths-cumulative-...
by sam_goody on 3/12/23, 12:46 PM
On the other hand they totally blew the power grab opportunities that were taken advantage of by others. So from that perspective there are many politicians that are laughing their way to the bank.
Lock downs became a political tool early on, and any place that still forces lock downs or masking is because politics. Which makes comparing them to another country an apple-and-oranges comparison.
by ofcourseyoudo on 3/12/23, 4:09 PM
And it's still true Sweden's approach was worse than theirs:
> However, Sweden did much worse than its Nordic neighbours, with Denmark registering just 1.5% excess mortality and Finland 1.0%. Norway had no excess mortality at all in 2020.
by lolc on 3/12/23, 1:35 PM
Looking at the numbers in retrospect we see that the approach taken by Sweden was a good one. Just picking this one statistic out of many possible is dishonest though.
by readonthegoapp on 3/14/23, 4:17 AM