by thealienthing on 12/21/22, 4:11 PM with 32 comments
by this_steve_j on 12/21/22, 5:48 PM
The goal of the battery-electric powertrain is to reduce fuel burn and CO2 emissions by 30% compared to a standard Dash-8 turboprop.
https://simpleflying.com/raytheon-completes-ground-test-dash...
by mikepavone on 12/21/22, 6:08 PM
> One 2,150 hp (1,600 kW) PW121 turboprop will be replaced by a 1 MW (1,300 hp) gas turbine joined with an electric motor of the same rating, powered by off-the-shelf lithium-ion batteries for takeoff and climb. The turbine is used alone in cruise and drives the motor-generator to recharge the batteries in descent. The downsized engine operates at its optimum for 30% fuel savings over 200–250 nmi (370–460 km). Range is reduced from 1,000 to 600 nmi (1,900 to 1,100 km) due to the higher empty weight and 50% lower fuel capacity.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_electric_aircraft
[1] https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/utcs-dash-8-hybrid-electr...
by Symmetry on 12/21/22, 10:30 PM
by alwaysanagenda on 12/21/22, 7:58 PM
I would imagine hitting the weight limit of traditional aircraft very quickly to get the same output of power.
oil's energy per square inch still can't be beat.
by dmitrygr on 12/21/22, 7:11 PM
Check how MANY checklists for how many situations require full power.
Maybe this has applications for unmanned stuff where it is ok to lose the craft sometimes (which explains Raytheon's interest) but for human carrying, this is idiocy, i say again.