by ethotool on 12/9/22, 12:17 AM with 112 comments
by danuker on 12/9/22, 12:53 AM
by thrill on 12/9/22, 2:14 AM
hitting a drone is unlikely to cause significant damage unless it hit in just the right spot. Seeing and overreacting to a drone might cause some damage but there is probably one second of altitude change there if any - that collision was already quite likely from the intercept path being flown. I've not flown either of those aircraft (before my time) but looking underneath during a turn requires effort and may not have even been possible, especially if there was a lack of awareness to prompt the look.
I think Juan's youtube video explaining the airborne change of directive from what in the comments on that video appears to have been an under briefed, and sadly under questioned briefing, is by far the most likely explanation.
by anigbrowl on 12/9/22, 3:57 AM
Serious people would show the video at normal speed, then slowed done, and added timecode, as well as documenting their methods. They also wouldn't make assumptions about what was going on, eg 'tries to restart the engine'. These black blobs look to me like compression artifacts, from zooming a video from a phone camera that was compressed for storage and then compressed again when uploaded to social media.
Also, even if there was an object and the engine went out (which seems unlikely, most drones are pretty fragile and would be destroyed by a propellor), losing power doesn't mean losing all control of the plane. Manual flight control would still work to some extent. But I don't see last-minute efforts to avoid a collision that tragically failed; it looks like the fighter was pointed straight at the bomber.
I haven't checked to see if it originates on 4chan, but it wouldn't surprise me. No-standards amateur sleuthing is the norm there, occasionally they get something right but their hit rate is like 5% at best. That's not stereotyping, I've been a regular there since 2008.
-------------------
EDIT: fieryskiff11 33 minutes ago [dead] | parent | next [–]
>I've been a regular there since 2008 Your username makes sense now
Not sure why, it's a made-up word I came up with in the 1990s for myself and is not meant to convey any secondary meaning. 4chan allows persistent usernames but I've never bothered to create one.
by leetrout on 12/9/22, 12:56 AM
by stephen_g on 12/9/22, 3:46 AM
EDIT: I think it was this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C342dfNPCyg
by ghastmaster on 12/9/22, 4:38 AM
Basically, it appears that the organizer/commander instructed the p-63f to take the 500ft path (distance from the crowd) and the b-17g to move to 1000ft distance while they were at the same altitude. Disorganization from the getgo led to the crash. If you see a general aviation crash and want to know what happened, check out what Dan has to say first.
by WalterBright on 12/9/22, 1:05 AM
by esaym on 12/9/22, 4:06 AM
by pastaguy1 on 12/9/22, 3:16 AM
by adamsb6 on 12/9/22, 5:14 AM
by dangle1 on 12/9/22, 12:54 AM
by jpgvm on 12/9/22, 11:48 AM
The sad reality of this incident is that it was likely just a result of poor vertical separation, either due to badly planned flight paths or lack of preparation, more likely both.
by vforvendettador on 12/9/22, 12:22 AM