by mjmasn on 12/8/22, 12:46 PM with 70 comments
by silvestrov on 12/8/22, 1:42 PM
https://www.nsia.no/Road/Investigations/22-441
It does not state why they conclude the cause was overload, only that "Uncovering the technical causal factors for the collapse of the Tretten bridge has been challenging. The expert group has worked its way through several hypotheses to be able to exclude non-relevant fracture mechanisms, by connecting findings to computational analyses. There was significant consequential damage to the bridge structure, both from the collapse itself, the impact with the ground and the salvage work, and it has been challenging to separate these from each other."
Personally I would think that a bridge should be able to handle "A passenger car and a truck with trailer loaded with lime were on the bridge when it collapsed".
by mywittyname on 12/8/22, 3:39 PM
He did a an episode on this bridge. It is excellent, and it provides some context about other timber bridges that is not discussed in this article.
by GeompMankle on 12/8/22, 2:19 PM
by rch on 12/8/22, 2:47 PM
You don't say...
by thordenmark on 12/8/22, 2:50 PM
by pornel on 12/8/22, 6:54 PM
by londons_explore on 12/8/22, 5:25 PM
This type of bridge needs every beam - so when one broke, the whole thing fell.
The mystery really is why it didn't collapse sooner - that's still under investigation.
by hackrnusr on 12/9/22, 6:48 AM
by numbsafari on 12/8/22, 2:52 PM
by tpmx on 12/8/22, 5:18 PM