by underscore_ku on 11/4/22, 4:51 PM with 2 comments
by quantified on 11/4/22, 5:40 PM
On average, if their advertising brings in profit they'll continue it. So this might be temporary.
If it is socially driven, two things come to mind: 1: They may just not like being associated with Musk. Now that Twitter is Musk, they're tied to him. 2: We're moving to an economy that is more obviously based on social group approvals/behaviors. Shunning and ostracising by some groups ("libs"/"SJWs", apparently) and support by other groups (MAGA, Qs) for one company or another feels a bit different than preferences by social classes or geographies.
Maybe this has been played out in past generations, for example how the temperance or abolition movements went. But those were about classes of behavior, not specific companies. Maybe the fact that we only have 1 Twitter in mind, not 10 different short message services, clouds my thinking there.
by jfengel on 11/4/22, 7:06 PM
Now, we've got the carrier demanding that they pay him to carry some speech.
The shoe is on the other hand, or something.