by throwarayes on 10/18/22, 1:32 PM with 285 comments
After a year of trying, coaching, assuming I’m the problem, talking to my skip level, hard convos with my boss, and much more etc I'm finally realizing trying to force myself into something that's simply not going to fit. With all humility I admit it may be me that failed. But life is short, it’s time to move on.
Cool story bro, why are you telling me?
Well I just want to say, the industry has an obsession with "growth" in performance reviews. But the reality is that growth only works when you build on someone's strengths. Trying to ask someone to grow by changing who they fundamentally are, leads to withdrawal, stagnation, and anti-growth. I'm actually getting worse at my job, not better, because I'm being forced to be something I'm not. It's depressing, draining, and frustrating. I can't be who I fundamentally am in my role.
It's important to know when your strengths are fundamentally misaligned with your job, boss, etc and leave ASAP. Don't try to force yourself to fit into it for the sake of "growth". You'll only drain yourself and there are better places for you. You may end up going through a traumatic experience that actually causes you to LOSE skills and abilities.
That is all, thanks.
by mattw2121 on 10/18/22, 1:49 PM
After he announced it, I had a 1x1 with him and clearly let him know that he was the boss and I'd do my best to accomplish anything he assigned me. I also let him know that the business analyst duties didn't fit well with my skillset and that I would very likely struggle to produce output. We had a good, honest conversation about the situation and I ended up staying 100% as a developer. In the end he was happy and I was happy.
Why am I telling you? It's that I've learned it better to communicate and hopefully work things out then just pack up and head to another place.
by ldjkfkdsjnv on 10/18/22, 1:58 PM
Everytime I have received some insultingly low offer from a startup, they start talking about "growth", "what I can own", "wearing many hats". Meanwhile, the founder is sitting on some 40% equity grant.
by theincredulousk on 10/18/22, 3:12 PM
One of the conclusions was that, essentially, the normal instinct with Performance Management to focus on improving weaknesses is wrong and leads to sub-optimal outcomes. The best managers actually doubled down on each individuals strengths, and simply accepted weaknesses as something to be smoothed out to the minimally acceptable level. (e.g. someone may not be "good with people", but they can't be openly hostile with co-workers.) Instead the manager would look for another employee which had that weakness as a strength, and manage responsibilities appropriately.
It speaks exactly to what was wrong in OP's experience.
by ajmurmann on 10/18/22, 2:17 PM
by exabrial on 10/18/22, 1:49 PM
by nscalf on 10/18/22, 2:42 PM
My advice for anyone in this spot is to quit quickly. I've left a number of jobs within the first month because it was an obvious bad fit. They likely weren't happy about it, but we'd all be miserable after 6+ months of me not performing how I know I can. Don't be sentimental about the work that went into getting the job, just go find a good fit.
by makz on 10/18/22, 2:04 PM
In reality they wanted me to do change management, negotiate budgets, negotiate dates, coordinate projects, make power point decks…
Because of my excellent track record delivering technical stuff they expected great results from me doing this new stuff. I couldn’t deliver it as they wanted. “You must grow and become a leader, that’s the path forward” they kept telling me. In the end it didn’t work and I left.
Now I’m in a new team and they expect me again to become a leader but this time it’s different, it is truly a technical leadership and I hope this time it will be different.
by mylons on 10/18/22, 1:49 PM
by jmartrican on 10/18/22, 2:02 PM
by yrgulation on 10/18/22, 1:57 PM
Spot on. Also remember your “boss” is not your owner. Nor are they all knowing. If the “boss” doesnt meet your requirements change the “boss”. It goes both ways.
by Consultant32452 on 10/18/22, 2:47 PM
It sounds like OP is getting on the verge of the brutal honesty and part of that is acknowledging the actual assigned work makes them miserable. That's fine, and if you can't be moved to a better fitting role then it's time to go.
Another alternative approach is to not care about your work reviews, as long as you're not getting fired, and look for your growth outside your 9-5 job. For the 9-5 think of it as just a tool to pay the bills while you do what you want to do. Performing at around the halfway mark compared to the rest of the team is good enough to not get fired. Use your new-found time, mental energy, etc. to focus on whatever personal or professional goals you want. That's how I started my business and it's going great.
by trynewideas on 10/19/22, 12:45 AM
After three years, in my last performance review with that manager, they told me to consider whether I really wanted to stay with the company in a nudge to get me to quit. I really did want to stay at the company, though, so I got on the company's internal job board and applied for a transfer to an open role in another department.
After those three years without a raise above cost of living or any consideration for a promotion, within a year in the new role I got promoted and a performance raise. After two years the company gave me an award, performance bonus, and another promotion at an offsite. I'd gone so deep into the self-loathing hole with my previous manager that I didn't even know work _could_ be like that, anywhere, much less at the same company working with many of the same people.
The new role wasn't even all that different - I still spent more than half my time doing the kind of work I'd expected to do when I joined the company, and even spent a significant chunk working across groups with the same people from my previous team. I was just under a different manager who, instead of trying to warp me into a different version of myself, quickly recognized what I was already good at, found what value that could bring to their team, and set me loose on it. I took off like a rocket.
As a nice side effect, I didn't lose vesting on my options and benefits, even if the options ended up being worthless.
by akudha on 10/18/22, 2:54 PM
In my previous job, I was asked to do QA work. I have never done QA work before - I don't mind doing it, but I didn't want to do only front end (color, pixel etc) QA work. Needless to day, it didn't work out for me and for my manager.
The best thing to do in such scenarios is to just leave, if that is an option. Especially in professional situations. I have had a lot of jobs in my life - some good, some bad, some super bad. The only thing that was common in ALL these jobs was this - nobody gave a fuck about anyone else, beyond using them to get stuff done. Yes, most people are polite and nice - that doesn't mean they care about you or anyone else. This is not bitterness speaking, this is just the reality. So the best thing to do, is just leave and find a better job
by cableshaft on 10/18/22, 2:39 PM
Like I never had much interest in DevOps, but previous jobs have put me in a situation where I had to learn it and although I sucked at it at first, I got better at it, and since it seems to have become almost an unescapable part of a full-stack web developer's job nowadays.
Also I haven't cared much about the domains of several companies I've been hired for or clients I've been put to work for as a consultant (like I actively tried to avoid the insurance and finance industry, and ended up doing work for both). Hasn't stopped me from learning that anyway, and I can follow along (mostly) with our client when they talk about wealth management concepts now, when I was totally lost in those conversations when I first started.
And at a previous job I knew nothing about developing phone systems, but did a little work here and there, and eventually became the department's 'phone systems expert' as I became the only person left in the department that knew enough about those systems as people transferred or left. I handled the role just fine until I left for another job. I don't do anything with phone systems now, but I do have a better understanding of how networks work because of that job, which has been useful.
It is an opportunity cost, though. I have lost some of my other skills because of time spent in these roles. Like I think I'd have trouble going back into video game development after spending so much time out of it, at least at the level of seniority that I would kind of need in order to get sort of in the ballpark of the salary I'm currently making.
I'm still making games in my spare time, but I don't have a ton of free time anymore, so progress has been slow and the games I've been working on have been tiny in comparison.
by MonkeyMalarky on 10/18/22, 1:46 PM
by dahart on 10/18/22, 3:00 PM
> I have a very different vision for my role
This is the critical piece, and I’m not asking for detail, but the details here are everything and it would be interesting to hear both sides of this mismatch in expectation.
That said, let’s not forget that a job is where we trade our time to spend doing something the company wants in return for money. This is complicated, but we can’t necessarily expect to have our own vision for our role, we can only seek out roles that fit us and hope that it’s an environment that either allows our vision or matches it. Some managers want people to build their own vision, and some don’t. Even though the best people and the strongest growth comes from people who do have their own vision and take initiative to change things, there’s also a ton of work out there where the company just needs something specific done, and that something might not be what you want.
BTW, from experience, a lot of this still mostly true even if you run your own startup; we just trade time for something the customer wants, and it often isn’t what we’d rather be doing.
> With all humility I admit it may be me that failed.
If it’s not a fit, then it’s not your failure. Go find a better fit! Good luck!
by wing-_-nuts on 10/18/22, 2:55 PM
Same thing happened to me. As I've gotten older management has been been more insistent on me taking a 'leadership' role. What they don't tell you is this is 2x the work (and the sort of work you hate the most) for ~ 10% more pay.
10% is the carrot. The stick is that they start telling you you're 'top of band' for a sr dev and that they can't give you raises going forward despite meeting and exceeding expectations. That particular shoe hasn't dropped just yet, but when it does, I might have to make some hard choices to keep my career moving forward.
by cluse on 10/28/22, 4:37 PM
by dougmwne on 10/18/22, 2:55 PM
We have a tendency to take all the blame onto ourselves. We have a society that tells you to take personal responsibility for everything from your career success to saving the planet. But fact is that if the ship is sinking you will go down too.
Find a better boat. It is the most powerful thing you can do in life.
by tibbon on 10/18/22, 2:47 PM
But then I got a great manager with a great manager over him. Suddenly, I knew what it was like to be supported properly. For the first time in over 10 years things clicked and made sense.
Turns out, mediocre managers do have a real impact on me.
by _greim_ on 10/18/22, 3:01 PM
by cntainer on 10/18/22, 2:00 PM
But if this is not the case then maybe your current skill set is not a good match to what is currently needed. I don't know, maybe someone else is already covering the things that you say you bring to the table, or the team's activity and goals are just a bad fit for you specifically.
> because I'm being forced to be something I'm not
Many managers see this as trying to help you grow, by getting you outside your comfort zone. In the end it's your choice if you want to play along or find a team/boss that makes better use of your contribution.
by neogodless on 10/18/22, 4:16 PM
https://www.marcusbuckingham.com/books/
It's been a good decade since I read some of these, but I recall that there is often a focus of "eliminating" weaknesses instead of avoiding them and focusing on strengths. But his interviews led him to believe the opposite is best - just work around weaknesses, but put most of your effort into expanding upon strengths.
EDIT: See this was mentioned already - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33248487
by cplusplusfellow on 10/18/22, 2:49 PM
Ultimately a move was what made my life better.
by binhex on 10/18/22, 1:52 PM
by lowbloodsugar on 10/18/22, 5:54 PM
by meristem on 10/18/22, 2:21 PM
by away271828 on 10/18/22, 2:51 PM
It happens and it's not necessarily anyone's fault. A new manager comes in with different views of what work needs to be done and what doesn't. For whatever reason maybe transferring internally is hard right now for whatever reason or maybe there just aren't other roles internally that excit you.
(What I have seen though is managers who come in, make changes in roles, and really try to hang onto headcount even if some of that headcount is people they wouldn't have hired. That's on them.)
Depending on a lot of factors maybe it makes sense to hang on for a while. But, at the end of the day, if you're in a job you don't really care for and don't really have the background for--especially if you're supposedly very senior--that's just not a stable or good situation.
by aynyc on 10/18/22, 3:06 PM
I disagree that growth can only come from strength. Like many coders, I was bad at communications, particularly in public speaking space. My boss needed an engineer that can present work at company meetings, he basically tasked me (mainly because I knew the system and business very well). It was 6 months of absolute terror as some of you might know. In the end, I succeeded. I learned more than about me than before, while my technical skills didn't improve, my soft skill improved leaps and bounds. My career also has improved significantly.
What I'm trying to say is, change is hard, especially if it impact the core of who you are. But like everything else in life, stepping out of your comfort zone is important for growth if that's something you desire.
by bulldog13 on 10/18/22, 1:46 PM
Like if your weakness is poor communication leading towards unintentional hostility to coworkers or inability to prioritize work, that weakness is probably worth be developed.
by throwawaymaths on 10/19/22, 12:56 AM
I'm only sticking around in the hopes of transferring to another department where my friend is the group leader.
by le-hu on 10/31/22, 5:28 PM
by daneel_w on 10/18/22, 2:28 PM
by giantg2 on 10/18/22, 2:04 PM
by Move37 on 10/18/22, 1:47 PM
I would even argue that is why some bigger firms such as stripe have a rotation model where you can explore new jobs and positions within the company.
Have you told your boss about how you feel?
by jpz on 10/18/22, 1:46 PM
You can’t escape yourself..,
by alexfromapex on 10/18/22, 5:32 PM
by gorbachev on 10/18/22, 2:04 PM
by paul7986 on 10/18/22, 2:26 PM
If you want to work in tech yet have little stress work in government IT.
Personally I could never work at places like meta, amazon, google and other places where you are under a heat lamp and those around u are too. Of course there's more money but for me the stress (affects health hugely) isn't worth it!
by quickthrower2 on 10/18/22, 10:48 PM
I totally agree with this. What poor companies do is try to force you into a process no matter what. The process is king and if you don't fit it, get out.
What they should do is go grab a coffee with you and ask you what your desires are on a regular basis. And even to some extent make the company strategy malleable to this (across all staff). That is if employee churn is an issue, which of course it is because hiring is a big hassle!
Obviously the more people in the company, the more standardization of process you need. You may have less need for certain roles that are jacks of all trades and need specialist squads. But there should be always room for asking staff what they ideally want and trying to get them closer to that.
by IntFee588 on 10/18/22, 3:21 PM
Respectfully disagree. Growth comes from going beyond what you're comfortable with.
Also not sure this is "ungrowth" and more a general misallocation of human capital. Good bosses are proactive, yes, but that doesn't mean randomly messing with team dynamics and roles like you're a chemist trying to find the philosopher's stone.
by brailsafe on 10/19/22, 8:47 AM
I like trying to get better at the things I've discovered some way to get progress at, but I hate trying to push myself to try and be perfect at something I can't.
by spaetzleesser on 10/18/22, 5:45 PM
In the last few months I have basically neglected my regular job which is to be a team lead and architect. Other people have picked up the slack to some degree but I feel more and more that my tech skills are going downhill because I am dealing with a software system that shouldn’t ever have been bought.
This is becoming a real career problem. I am learning “skills” that are totally useless in any sane company and neglecting the skills that can get you a good job.
by whateveracct on 10/18/22, 6:22 PM
I'm pretty high up the IC chain (the leveling guide even says my level is a natural place for someone to be at for a long time/indefinitely). And I'm not interested in the next level. More, I'm not interested in growing professionally anymore.
That's not to say I'm not gonna keep solving problems and learning new things. But at this point, I'd just like to be Very Good at What I Do for the next years.
I'm busy growing personally on many axes anyways. But they aren't useful to my employer. But I only have so much "self-improvement" juice to give.
by jtwebman on 10/18/22, 3:05 PM
Also growth isn't always just building on strengths. It is also knowing where you are short on skill and learning more to at least do that skill ok and then maybe delicate or trade tasks with someone that is better at it. It is about understanding yourself.
by noufalibrahim on 10/19/22, 8:13 AM
One of two things will emerge. The employee has strengths which can be used to benefit both parties (employer and employee) and can be grown which creates a career path. Or the employees strengths are of no use to the company and they part ways amicably.
This is the sensible way to product growth and trying to shoehorn someone into an unsuitable position is damaging to the company and the employee.
by lloydatkinson on 10/18/22, 4:18 PM
https://www.lloydatkinson.net/posts/2022/my-thoughts-on-what...
by Msw242 on 10/18/22, 1:48 PM
I'm a founder at a small company, and the current environment has us stagnating a bit
My biggest fear is that our best contributors go elsewhere because we aren't able to fully enable their growth here right now
I've lucked out in terms of how loyal my team is, but loyalty only goes so far, and the business has an obligation to enable the careers of it's contributors
Basically just saying, there are two sides to every deal and if you're not thriving due to environment, you have a responsibility to yourself to find an environment where you will thrive
by pkaler on 10/18/22, 2:02 PM
What do you think your strengths are? Which strengths does the manager want you to grow?
by nohankyou on 10/18/22, 3:28 PM
This is how I hire, I look for people willing to adapt and learn, because our field changes constantly you have to be able and willing to adapt to it. That may not be comfortable.
by Taylor_OD on 10/18/22, 3:06 PM
by mustafabisic1 on 10/18/22, 4:57 PM
One of the basic principle was you can only be world-class in your natural strengths.
Some of others were: - Try to ask why as less as possible as it's getting your rationalisations and emotional most of the time - Ask what might I do differently instead - Risk, trust, honesty triangle - These need to be equal at all times for teams to be effective - Never judge and never say bad/good. Works/doesn't work are alternatives
by Izmaki on 10/18/22, 2:37 PM
Yours truely, A dude on your train.
by Bhurn00985 on 10/18/22, 2:56 PM
Always remember failure has no inherent meaning, it only has the meaning we attach to it. This can be a liberating realization.
by nuancebydefault on 10/18/22, 8:37 PM
by danielmarkbruce on 10/19/22, 8:27 PM
It's especially hard if you've basically been good at the things you have done in life, not realizing you either got lucky choosing things you were good at, just tended to be drawn to things you were good at without realizing why, or got jobs at things because others realized the good match...
by testbjjl on 10/18/22, 1:50 PM
by adave on 10/18/22, 10:56 PM
by soheil on 10/18/22, 2:42 PM
Now if she's being a jerk and forcing you into a corner by learning things you don't want to then leave immediately.
by arandr0x on 10/19/22, 1:18 PM
Sometimes jobs change on you too. One position used to be for you, and now they need someone different. You should almost never strive to become that someone different.
by zuzuleinen on 10/18/22, 3:09 PM
by SoftTalker on 10/18/22, 5:30 PM
2. If it's not a fit, it's not a personal indictment. Move on. Not everything you do in life works out. However, if this happens over and over, it might be you.
by hluska on 10/18/22, 5:32 PM
But just in case you need to hear this, I don’t know you but I believe in you. It takes a lot of skill to write something tactically useful when you’re in the deep end of shit pool. You’ve got this.
by luis_cho on 10/18/22, 6:50 PM
https://www.amazon.com/Case-Degrowth-Giorgos-Kallis/dp/15095...
by qwertyzxcvmnbvw on 10/18/22, 2:07 PM
by danesparza on 10/18/22, 2:13 PM
The world needs a happy version of you. Everybody benefits then.
by dolongbien on 10/19/22, 2:45 AM
by MrWiffles on 10/18/22, 5:25 PM
So, again, thank you for posting this.
by abrax3141 on 10/18/22, 2:54 PM
n=((y-1920)-a)/(0.25*a)
where y is the current year (e.g., 2022), a is your age in years, and n is the number of careers you have ahead of you.Quit!
by trilobyte on 10/19/22, 10:13 PM
by guynamedloren on 10/19/22, 4:26 AM
This is well articulated and certain something many of us can relate to. Thanks for writing this.
by satellites on 10/18/22, 2:59 PM
by spookierookie on 10/18/22, 2:44 PM
Agree 100% btw.
by grepLeigh on 10/18/22, 2:16 PM
by honkler on 10/18/22, 1:45 PM
2. Achieve them
3. ??
4. Profit
by totalZero on 10/19/22, 3:51 PM
Just my viewpoint though.
by beckingz on 10/18/22, 2:43 PM
Softskills.audio
by russiasux on 10/20/22, 1:56 AM