by chelmzy on 10/6/22, 4:47 PM with 128 comments
by kube-system on 10/6/22, 5:51 PM
Of course, criminals aren't going to turn in their guns. Gun buybacks have always just been useful for their second order effects -- forgotten guns in attics being stolen, found by kids, etc.
Yes, people take advantage of these events. There's not much of a way to filter participants by intent. People turn in broken or rusty junk that is not of danger anyway. Doing it with a junk plastic gun is not much different than doing the same with junk guns made from other materials. But the bottom line is I don't think anyone ever thought that the results of these events would be 1-for-1 removal of crime guns off the street.
by chroma on 10/6/22, 5:54 PM
These people do this for two reasons. First, it's profitable (though that's likely to change as the buyback programs begin to exclude 3D printed guns). Second, it shows that it is incredibly cheap and easy to make firearms and illegal parts. Anyone with a $200 printer can build a safe and reliable semi-automatic handgun. It's even easier to build devices that convert a semi-auto firearm to full auto. Like the war on drugs, the policymakers have lost, they just don't know it yet.
1. https://twitter.com/CobraEconomics/status/155541335225971916...
2. https://twitter.com/kem_regik/status/1570191067235946496
by tekla on 10/6/22, 5:42 PM
https://www.wktv.com/news/local/nyag-changes-gun-buyback-rul...
https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/houston-gun-buyback/...
by rolph on 10/6/22, 5:27 PM
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, a spokesperson at the Attorney General's Office released the following statement:
“It’s shameful that this individual exploited a program that has successfully taken thousands of guns off the streets to protect our communities from gun violence. We have partnered with local police throughout the state to recover more than 3,500 guns, and one individual’s greedy behavior won’t tarnish our work to promote public safety. We have adjusted our policies to ensure that no one can exploit this program again for personal gain.”
by nivertech on 10/6/22, 5:35 PM
by mynameishere on 10/6/22, 5:45 PM
by Steltek on 10/6/22, 5:50 PM
1. Spent time, electricity, and filament printing lowers and other components. He's a beginner using a $200 printer so the failure rate was probably pretty high.
2. He drove from NY to Utah
3. He haggled all day before getting paid out for only 42 of his 100 "guns"
And he thinks he's making Utah's buyback program look foolish? This guy wasted a stupendous amount of time and money.
by joshcryer on 10/6/22, 5:58 PM
by zerocrates on 10/6/22, 5:58 PM
by BonoboIO on 10/6/22, 5:58 PM
by f1shy on 10/6/22, 7:36 PM
It is difficult to make good public policies.
by silexia on 10/6/22, 5:40 PM
by zanethomas on 10/6/22, 6:06 PM
by cfeduke on 10/6/22, 5:44 PM