by dbz on 12/4/11, 1:12 AM with 11 comments
by jws on 12/4/11, 3:54 AM
The battery chemistry is cheaper than lithium ion, but also heavier for the same energy storage. Sounds like more than a few times heavier, but hard to tell from the article. In any event, aimed at grid storage, energy density isn't as important as for portable electronics.
The fly in the ointment is that they do not have a suitable anode terminal, but as researchers that just gives them something to work on.
by narkee on 12/4/11, 6:46 AM
It seems like every single research institution in the past 10 years has announced some battery breakthrough, via metamaterials, carbon nano-tubes, super-capacitors, etc.
I've yet to see much follow through. It's getting tiresome to read about.
by joelrunyon on 12/4/11, 7:12 AM
I know they mention price at one point in the article, but for something that's bound to have a massive impact on a huge variety of industries, I can't imagine that the money hurdle is insurmountable.
by RShackleford on 12/4/11, 12:30 PM