by axelsvensson on 9/12/22, 9:20 PM with 4 comments
I keep thinking that "someone" could use cryptographic time-stamping as one line of defense. As a philanthropic effort, it seems relatively easy, cheap and valuable to do so. I imagine a web archive could save a stream of hashes not seen before, occasionally compile a merkle root and publish it in several places where time of publication is common knowledge.
Is this being done, else why not? It seems like an opportunity too good to pass on.
by muzani on 9/13/22, 2:08 AM
This prevents tampering. But what about deepfakes?
First, we didn't verify photos from gallery. That's where most of your deepfakes would come from.
Second, you had to take a photo from the app. You can't put an AI filter on the camera, because the app itself directly accesses the Android camera API. I think one possibility would be to hack this API to put the deepfake filter, but I don't know any way to do this yet.
The consequence here is you can still have deepfakes, but you'll probably see more of these verification apps. Probably suited for CCTVs, dash cams, news cameras. Maybe we'll see it baked into hardware and operating systems in the future?
by Someone on 9/12/22, 10:24 PM
Cryptographic time-stamping can show that a set of images existed at some time, but not that no other images existed at that time.
So, unless you manage to time-stamp most images in the world, there will be a huge set of images without provenance.
The creator of fake content will just add to that set.
by axelsvensson on 9/12/22, 10:04 PM