by folkster on 11/19/11, 9:57 PM with 123 comments
by korussian on 11/20/11, 12:31 AM
The only issue is: I need a much larger rez image to put up on the big projector. Since this is doing Google Image Search... any chance for a:
[plus]
[plus]
by kristopolous on 11/19/11, 11:04 PM
After not seeing any, I decided to just try my name ... and found a football player.
by garethsprice on 11/19/11, 11:24 PM
For example: http://kittens.jpg.to/301.jpg
Another feature could be to return a random result for that image search.
For example: http://ass.jpg.to/random.jpg
by MetalMASK on 11/20/11, 12:22 AM
behind-the-scene technical aspect are not difficult to realize (either google image API, which is deprecated, or parse the result of http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=h... and get the first image url after a predefined string anchor, say <span class=rg_ctlv>), but the idea to simplify input and output is brilliant.
To deal with not-so-good image search result: since google image search is presenting the result in a thumbnail group, it might be worthwhile to look into their ranking scheme for the result. It might be that the first one (on the top left) is not the most relevant result. It won't shock me if google ranked the relevance of result from center to peripheral. In the end that's how we look at a pile of images--we tend to start from the middle. Try a few examples, from the ones I tried the middle row middle column image is much more relevant than the top left result.
just my two cents.
by Nican on 11/20/11, 7:08 AM
by keithgibson on 11/20/11, 5:11 AM
by ck2 on 11/19/11, 10:48 PM
by revorad on 11/19/11, 11:28 PM
by pluies on 11/19/11, 11:40 PM
And it's not even limited to jpg, cf. http://drumroll.jpg.to/
by kgermino on 11/19/11, 10:48 PM
Top result in Google Images? Looks like it anyway.
Thanks for giving me something to pay with while waiting on the slowest server in the world at work :)
by hammock on 11/19/11, 11:55 PM
by Zirro on 11/20/11, 12:58 PM
Other than that, I'm liking this and looking forward to the extra parameters.
by civilian on 11/20/11, 12:02 AM
by alpb on 11/19/11, 11:06 PM
by edd on 11/20/11, 12:49 PM
Just because an image is on the internet does not mean you can reproduce it. I ran a couple of words I knew return copyrighted images and sure enough they come up.
by speedemin on 11/20/11, 2:37 AM
by kloncks on 11/19/11, 11:11 PM
by ff0066mote on 11/19/11, 11:31 PM
by madiator on 11/20/11, 8:28 AM
by program on 11/20/11, 12:31 PM
javascript:(function(){var A='';if(window.getSelection) A=window.getSelection().toString();else if(document.getSelection) A=document.getSelection().toString();else if(document.selection) A=document.selection.createRange().text;A=A.replace(/\s+/,'-');if(A===''||!/^[a-z0-9_\-]+$/i.test(A))A='try-again';window.open('http://'+encodeURIComponent(A.toLowerCase())+'.jpg.to');}());
not tested at all.by wicknicks on 11/20/11, 12:39 AM
http://111111.jpg.to/ (I was hoping to get something related to November/11/2011 here).
by _gd3l on 11/19/11, 11:54 PM
But then if I needed a 500x500 picture of Bruce Willis, because who doesn't, I could go to http://bruce_wilis.jpg.to/500x500
Fun little app. Nice work.
by henshinger on 11/20/11, 12:13 PM
by jrockway on 11/20/11, 5:39 AM
by dylangs1030 on 11/20/11, 1:52 AM
1. Can you make this faster to type than a browser extension that searches from the address bar (or in Chrome's case, omnibox)?
2. How do you account for false positives, like a picture that doesn't match the word?
by tikhonj on 11/19/11, 10:45 PM
hn.jpg.to, on the other hand, is probably not related to hacker news :)
by suyash on 11/20/11, 12:09 AM
by sanxiyn on 11/20/11, 5:51 AM
by codejoust on 11/20/11, 1:28 AM
by guscost on 11/20/11, 4:57 AM
by solokumba on 11/20/11, 1:09 AM
Nice.
by Wazzup12 on 11/20/11, 5:07 PM
by liedra on 11/20/11, 10:44 AM
by christos on 11/20/11, 5:27 AM
by awlo on 11/20/11, 7:44 AM
by ThePinion on 11/21/11, 2:42 AM
by gumba on 11/21/11, 10:09 AM
by johnbatch on 11/20/11, 12:26 AM
by sjwright on 11/20/11, 2:45 AM
by fsantagonza on 11/27/11, 8:06 PM
by mikeflynn on 11/20/11, 7:41 PM
by aawc on 11/20/11, 12:34 AM
by tathagatadg on 11/19/11, 11:51 PM
by Neodudeman on 11/19/11, 11:45 PM
by dschoon on 11/20/11, 1:12 AM
by tzs on 11/20/11, 12:37 AM
by wahwah on 11/20/11, 12:22 AM
by leak on 11/19/11, 10:09 PM
by Calamitous on 11/20/11, 1:28 AM
by fsantagonza on 11/27/11, 8:06 PM
by folkster on 11/19/11, 9:58 PM
by dicroce on 11/20/11, 12:30 AM
by diamondhead on 11/20/11, 6:11 AM
by rewiter2011 on 11/20/11, 2:04 AM
also the dns is not setup corectly to handle spaces in domains mentioned here
by grobo on 11/19/11, 11:38 PM