by 1penny42cents on 8/21/22, 6:19 PM with 83 comments
by leto_ii on 8/21/22, 9:04 PM
The odds that any particular person will always be right are basically zero. It's way more likely that you're just consuming things that reinforce prior beliefs and make you feel good.
Make sure that you're periodically engaging with people who challenge your beliefs.
by pessimizer on 8/21/22, 8:41 PM
Walter Jackson Freeman III: https://web.archive.org/web/20160627160850/http://sulcus.ber...
Eric Schwitzgebel: http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/
Walter Segal: http://www.segalbuildings.me.uk/
Adam Smith
David Graeber
by poxwole on 8/21/22, 7:53 PM
by aamargulies on 8/21/22, 9:02 PM
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB5ShJRcpNFPz_2uazuT4XJ3y...
I didn’t think it possible to learn this much this quickly.
by ycombinatorrio on 8/21/22, 8:37 PM
by orware on 8/21/22, 9:01 PM
And in particular there is a 3-volume series that was available for a few years that put together a lot of the work he had done during his lifetime, even though his most popular seemed to be "As a Man Thinketh".
The Wisdom of James Allen I, II, and III: https://www.amazon.com/Wisdom-James-Allen-Including-Prosperi... https://www.amazon.com/Wisdom-James-Allen-Difficulties-Trium... https://www.amazon.com/Wisdom-James-Allen-III-Heavenlylife/d...
It's been a number of years since I last read them, and unfortunately the publisher above went out of business so you can generally only find the titles above used, but I did enjoy the philosophy/thinking shared in the writing, even if their titles may indicate a somewhat religious slant, overall I'd say the writings focus more on leading a good life.
This is a good reminder I should read them again to refresh my memory on all that is discussed within the pages however, since it has been probably over 15+ years since I first read them thoroughly.
by thomassmith65 on 8/21/22, 7:43 PM
He has known a lot of powerful people, so when he discusses world events, he doesn't need to talk out of his behind. He's a serious enough scholar that there's substance behind his views.
He's not particularly iconoclastic. His opinions are mildly progressive, nothing outlandish.
What I value about him is that he's relentlessly reasonable, and that's hard to find online.
by mindcrime on 8/21/22, 8:05 PM
Ben Goertzel
Joscha Bach
Michael Munger
Michael Posner
Miguel Nicolelis
Melanie Mitchell
by andrewprock on 8/21/22, 8:29 PM
Spent years proving 1+1=2, and delved deep into the intersection between reason and philosophy.
by skywal_l on 8/21/22, 7:59 PM
by stene on 8/21/22, 7:02 PM
Mostly resonates with me because he seems to freely challenge established norms in very thought provoking ways.
by soldeace on 8/21/22, 8:42 PM
by mikewarot on 8/21/22, 7:32 PM
Daniel Schmachtenberger gave me a strong heads up on societal energy blindness
Kevlin Henney taught me far more about programming than I thought I even needed to know. I'll never approach multi-threaded programming the same way again.
Eric Weinstein made me aware of the embedded growth obligations that have de-ranged so many of our institutions. It was quite a wake-up call.
by ilrwbwrkhv on 8/21/22, 8:42 PM
by randcraw on 8/21/22, 7:30 PM
by infamia on 8/22/22, 10:02 PM
John McWhorter, whom I admire very much as a person and a thinker.
[0] = The Law by Bastiat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gob_pa3BAU
by soheilpro on 8/22/22, 12:37 AM
by dperalta on 8/21/22, 9:28 PM
by Isinlor on 8/21/22, 11:54 PM
Alan Turing for model of computation
Kurt Gödel for incompleteness theorem
Erwin Schrödinger for "What is life?" book
Hugh Everett for many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
Seth Lloyd for ultimate physical limits to computation
John von Neumann for self-replicating spacecraft or von Neumann probe
Robin Hanson for Grabby Aliens model
Nick Bostrom for idea of existential risk
Richard Dawkins for many God debates and books
John Stuart Mill for Harm principle
Elon Musk for rockets reusability
Diogenes for simplicity and Diogenes and Alexander anecdote
Horace for Exegi monumentum poem
by selfhifive on 8/21/22, 8:39 PM
by misterioss on 8/21/22, 7:55 PM
by james-redwood on 8/22/22, 6:02 AM
by cnorthwood on 8/21/22, 8:38 PM
by redwood on 8/21/22, 8:42 PM
by janikvonrotz on 8/21/22, 8:31 PM
by xcambar on 8/21/22, 8:38 PM
by braingenious on 8/21/22, 9:00 PM
by erlend_sh on 8/21/22, 9:26 PM
Douglass Rushkoff (techno-anarchy, collectivism)
Charles Eisenstein (ecosystems)
Duncan Trussel (mysticysm, spirituality)
Richard Rour (non-dual religiosity)
Tara Brach (meditation)
Sharon Salzburg (meditation)
Jane McAlevey (organizer)
by sn0w_crash on 8/22/22, 1:44 AM
Also this thread is an ideological doxxing but it’s hilarious
by bmacho on 8/21/22, 6:58 PM
He mostly takes concepts (from a board range of fields), and abuses them, and it turns out to be funny.
by LargoLasskhyfv on 8/21/22, 9:13 PM
by mbostleman on 8/21/22, 9:06 PM
by eftokay83 on 8/21/22, 8:43 PM
He has fundamentally changed some of my values and thoughts about me, the world and my place within it.
Highly recommend some lectures or talks from him.
by togs on 8/21/22, 9:38 PM
by jfabre on 8/21/22, 8:45 PM
Ayn Rand
Elon Musk
Eric Weinstein
Jordan Peterson
Joscha Bach
Noam Chomsky
Paul Graham
Yeah that's cheesy, but his essays had a big influence on me and is the reason I'm on this forum.
Peter ThielThomas Sowell
by BMc2020 on 8/21/22, 9:45 PM
by ultrablack on 8/21/22, 9:03 PM
by Witosso on 8/21/22, 8:41 PM
by dogcomplex on 8/21/22, 9:11 PM
Nicholas Taleb (skeptic/economist), Alexander Wales (rationalist author), /r/rational (rationalist fiction), Chapo Trap House podcast (leftist politics, comedy), Richard D Wolff (economist), Stephen West (philosophy historian), Jonathan Blow (game designer, skeptic programmer), Vitalik Buterin (kinda the only crypto person I trust who is genuinely smart)
Then of course Noam Chomsky / Slavoy Zizek (famously-rigorously-intelligent leftists). William Macaskill (Effective Altruism, moral utilitarianism at its finest). Adam Curtis (prescient documentary-style reporter).
Long list to not have a female on... feelsbad. Um - not sure how to change that - it seems like at least partially a general topic of interest thing? Not so many women in the philosophy/tech/economics/world-politics space? Kinda should actively search for that now tbh
Edit: I was downvoted to negatives presumably for saying "ngl some cringe names around here"... referring of course to the much larger collection of Rand and Peterson fans than I expected. I have since acknowledged my mistake, that use of woke terms like "cringe" in this neutral-thought safe-space is itself clearly a far greater crime and thus my post should be cancelled, and there is no irony in that or inherent political bias embedded in the platform by maintaining such neutrality as sacrosanct above passive-aggressive behavior like mine