by dzuc on 8/13/22, 1:48 PM with 272 comments
by forgotmypw17 on 8/13/22, 4:55 PM
by caymanjim on 8/13/22, 5:30 PM
> They write that, “Four years later we found ourselves on the largest container ship in the world on our way from Sweden to China.” As per the trip: “We had started the journey by truck to Middle Sweden, then by freight train to the port of Gothenburg, and after four weeks at sea, we filmed from a truck again, this time from the port of Shenzhen to a factory in Bao’an.”
The idea of following a single, real object from point of manufacture to destination--documenting all the transfers and hiccups along the way--is interesting to me. Presenting it in reverse chronological order is an artistic decision I'm ambivalent about. But it doesn't sound like that's what they did. They didn't track a pedometer; they just took freight vehicles along a path that maybe the thing went on, without following the actual transfer of the item from box to container, from truck to ship, etc.
I'm disappointed. I was ready to actually watch the whole thing. But it's contrived.
by logisticsfilm on 8/13/22, 6:01 PM
Feel free to ask us anything!
official site is logisticsartproject.com
by idiocrat on 8/13/22, 4:12 PM
A container ship is sailing through a water highway, docks. The containers are getting unloaded/loaded.
by collegeburner on 8/13/22, 3:30 PM
by radicality on 8/13/22, 6:01 PM
I don’t see any info on their page either https://logisticsartproject.com/
I wonder how large (in file size) the final cut was and what codecs were used. Such slow moving footage probably compresses well, but at 857 hours of footage it’s probably still big.
by lifeisstillgood on 8/13/22, 3:24 PM
It is extraordinary but then again it's just "the container will be here in three weeks"
by TulliusCicero on 8/14/22, 12:50 AM
International trade is not the same thing as capitalism. International trade existed before capitalism, and if capitalism disappeared tomorrow, short of everyone simultaneously adopting anarcho-primitivism, we would still have trade between nations.
by rahimnathwani on 8/13/22, 3:17 PM
by rendall on 8/13/22, 3:43 PM
Bit of a stretch. Would anarchist shipping take less time or be less boring somehow?
by mpalmer on 8/13/22, 9:37 PM
by drited on 8/13/22, 8:58 PM
If you ask me though, based on this paragraph they did actually find the world's longest horror film! As for the anti-capitalism hints in the article, try watching an 857 hour film without starving in a non-capitalist economy!
"There came a point about three weeks into my viewing where the maddening, non-Euclidean shape of Logistics fully formed in my mind. I had an unnerving migraine. I could barely get myself together, let alone watch a boat not move for nine hours. I thought about quitting or taking a few days off, but then it occurred to me: the crew of the ship couldn’t quit, and the filmmakers couldn’t take a day off. I was now a part of this filmic thing, and I couldn’t stop until it was done."
by boomboomsubban on 8/13/22, 3:43 PM
by neilv on 8/13/22, 10:18 PM
by permo-w on 8/13/22, 5:58 PM
we get it, the film is an art piece making a point about how capitalism compresses time and space into inconsequential objects. it was a big undertaking schedule-wise. you don’t have to say this backwards and forwards 5 times
compress your article space and time-wise
by wizardforhire on 8/13/22, 4:30 PM
by hef19898 on 8/13/22, 7:11 PM
>> Logistics may have been birthed into this world in 2012, but the past few years have given the film a second life, with the pandemic laying bare the fragility of just-in-time logistics.
I so hoped we got past that already... JIT had nothing to do, as a root cause that is, with the supply issues the world is facing since the pandemic. I hate this meme so much.
That being said, I live the film project! Even if I would never watch 35 days plus on part of my day job, the idea is great so!
by readerbaza on 8/23/22, 10:52 AM
Would you watch a real time "movie" of the countless man-years it took to design and develop the infrastructure that made it possible for you to "watch", write and publish about this? I thought so.
by Aachen on 8/14/22, 12:02 AM
This is what the submission redirects me to, a 1x1 image the browser says: 
by keepquestioning on 8/13/22, 10:13 PM
by causality0 on 8/13/22, 8:42 PM
This is meaningless bullshit. The fact you can purchase, for an hour's wage, a digital pedometer than was built on one continent from raw materials from another and then shipped to a third is a breathtaking triumph.
by manytree on 8/13/22, 3:16 PM
by tasuki on 8/13/22, 8:06 PM
Either you're working or you're watching a movie. I know people who claim they do both at the same time, but I don't think they're actually doing either.
by UIUC_06 on 8/13/22, 3:38 PM
So deep. So profound.
> Logistics is the filmic annihilation of capitalist relations to time by a force of ultra-cinematic space. Logistics isn’t a feat of temporal duration, it’s a feat of spatial presence.
Such overwrought prose. Such "forcing everything into a Marxist framework."
Leonard A. Read talked about the pencil and how no one person could possibly make one, in 1958: https://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl.html?chapter_n... and he wasn't the first, either.
The supply chain expands, but the principle stays the same.
by akudha on 8/13/22, 3:11 PM
by codeflo on 8/13/22, 3:40 PM
by gurumeditations on 8/13/22, 3:32 PM