by Lucent on 7/23/22, 4:17 PM with 1 comments
microCOVID has an adjusted prevalence percent that uses Youyang Gu's simple formula https://covid19-projections.com/estimating-true-infections-revisited/ which multiplies cases by the square root of test positivity and another factor, 2.
I contacted him about whether this was still a good model for a simple dashboard I made https://knoxville.day/ and he responded, "...that equation is from 2020. I don't think it's relevant anymore, so I wouldn't use it. The true prevalence multiplier is much higher now due to the availability of at-home testing."
Is there a better, still simple formula out there for combining these two numbers into one? Without it, I'm lost as to whether 100 cases a day at 40% positive is worse than 200 at 10% and can't make evidence-based decisions on what to do. Or, if much more advanced models exist, is there a dashboard that takes historical cases, positivity, and population into account to estimate the percent in my county with a currently active infection?
by PaulHoule on 7/23/22, 4:59 PM
Also if people are getting COVID and not getting very sick who cares?