by Jason_Protell on 6/24/22, 8:19 PM with 48 comments
by rayiner on 6/24/22, 9:23 PM
In reality, Roe was the left’s Lochner. A pure exercise of judicial law making that could not point to anything in the Constitutional text or history to support a sweeping rule. It’s a precedent that even folks in the left have taken to defending merely by virtue of its existence as such. It’s protection of second trimester abortions is out of step with public opinion, and out of step among the law in other civilized nations.
Not all liberal precedents are like that. In fact most aren’t. There’s a huge difference between Brown and Loving and Obergefell and Roe both legally and in how the relevant issues have played out in domestic and international politics. Nonetheless, it will make political hay to act like overturning Roe will unleash the floodgates of rolling back everything else. Never mind the fact that, even though Roe was so vulnerable from the very beginning, it took conservatives 50 years of single-minded effort to overturn it.
by tablespoon on 6/24/22, 9:18 PM
With modern polarization, "confidence" actually seems to mean "confidence I'll get the result I want from it" (e.g. how ideologically aligned it is to me).
by belly_joe on 6/24/22, 9:15 PM
by bryanrasmussen on 6/24/22, 9:15 PM
by itsdrewmiller on 6/28/22, 2:48 AM
by DLA on 6/24/22, 9:01 PM