by rdubs333 on 5/29/22, 10:15 PM with 65 comments
by cpncrunch on 5/29/22, 11:41 PM
by moistly on 5/30/22, 12:17 AM
In this area we have indigenous families that have histories that go back for many hundreds and even thousands of years. I live in an area that had been idyllic for as long as any family can remember, a claim backed by geo/biological evidence. There is no record of the area climate behaving like this. The change has been abrupt and extreme and, frankly, dangerous.
by Lich on 5/30/22, 12:10 AM
by the_third_wave on 5/30/22, 8:38 AM
https://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.181504.1647960904!/image/a...
Notice the steady increase (called "global brightening"). This graph is produced and hosted by the Swedish Meteorological & Hydrological Institute (SMHI). They don't produce similar graphs for longer periods nor do they show the correspondence between average insolation and temperature. Fortunately the data is available for Stockholm (see e.g. page 184 of IPCC's AR5 - Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, [1]) which made it possible to create such a graph:
The correspondence between insolation and average temperature is very strong but it hardly ever gets mentioned in the public discourse around climate change. It is discussed on page 186 of AR5 chapter 2 [1] where the observation is made that there is a correspondence and there are numerous studies which come to the same conclusion but as so often is the case there is little to no relation between what the scientific literature says and how the media presents this.
[1] https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5...
by mistrial9 on 5/30/22, 12:18 AM
by aaronbrethorst on 5/30/22, 1:23 AM
"Climate"
"Not Found"
by refurb on 5/30/22, 12:14 AM
What the article says is the average high/low of the first 11 days is hotter than the hottest month.
Uhhh… statistics don’t work like that?
You cant compare a part month to a full month and make that claim because your selectively comparing some days to an average of a whole month.
by swayvil on 5/30/22, 2:13 AM
Much extreme seesawing of temperature too.
by formerkrogemp on 5/30/22, 12:03 AM
by chrisgnarly on 5/29/22, 11:41 PM
by xet7 on 5/30/22, 12:31 AM
> Our hottest May in history gets much worse next week
> What we have seen so far in the month of May is nothing short of extraordinary. When you take the average temperature (morning lows & afternoon highs) in Austin through the first 11 days of the month, you get 82.2 degrees. That is 1.6 degrees higher than the next hottest May on the list, 2018. I know that doesn't sound like much, but that is a significant margin when looking at multi-day averages. Unfortunately, our lead will only increase with the third week of May likely to shatter numerous records across the state of Texas.
> May 2022 is our hottest May in history through the first 11 days.
> First, WHY have we been so hot so early in the year? It has been the perfect storm of ingredients including a La Nina phase of the El Nino Southern Oscillation, our worst drought in seven years, and finally a very early showing of a ridge of high pressure that has been stubborn over the southern U.S. High pressure consists of sinking air in the lower and middle levels of the atmosphere, and physics dictates that when air sinks, it compresses, and compressed air is hotter.
> Now, onto the forecast for the next 7 to 10 days in Texas. The ridge of high pressure is in the process of reorganizing and intensifying over Mexico, and it will return to Texas as early as this weekend. It won't be in a hurry to leave either with this sinking air situated over the state through all of next week.
> In Austin, that gets us to the upper 90s as early as Saturday and near/above 100 by Sunday and Monday. Hitting 100 this early in the year is highly unusual with this marking our third earliest trip to triple digits in Austin's recorded history. We could push even higher though through the second half of next week.
by tamaharbor on 5/30/22, 1:50 AM
by z9znz on 5/30/22, 12:03 AM
[Edit - continuing after it finished resulted in a blank page. Refreshing the page resulted in "403 Forbidden". Clearly they just do not want you to disable the optional cookies. It is Sinclair after all, so I'm surprised I didn't have to provide voter registration info to get in.]
" We are processing the requested change to your cookie preferences.
This may take up to a few minutes to process. Processing 67%
Some opt-outs may fail due to your browsers cookies settings. If you would like to set opt-out preferences using this tool you must allow third party cookies in your browser settings.
Powered by: Company logo for TrustArc "