by vampiretooth1 on 4/23/22, 6:40 PM with 33 comments
by ProjectArcturis on 4/23/22, 7:34 PM
Edit: I looked at their site and it's clear that their business model is just to gather assets to charge fees on. Which is why they've developed strategies like Inverse Cramer, Pelosi Tracker, WallStreetBets -- these strategies don't have any alpha, they're just designed to catch the eye of retail traders.
Also this scumbaggery, from their website:
"$70M+ Assets Committed*"
Then way at the bottom:
"* = "Assets committed" refers to captured user behavior in attempted investments and not to assets being actively managed."
by calderwoodra on 4/23/22, 6:50 PM
I imagine following a cat picking random stocks works about as well. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/01/14/169326326/hous...
by pavlov on 4/23/22, 7:13 PM
by robonerd on 4/23/22, 7:30 PM
by chii on 4/24/22, 4:00 AM
That's not what cramer's predictions are though - his predictions are likely not far off from a random flip of the coin. So an inverse is likely to perform just as well (or poorly) as the real prediction!
by leobg on 4/24/22, 9:51 AM
by tjs8rj on 4/23/22, 6:44 PM
Is there a case for this as an actual investment or primarily novelty?